ArticleJBMR plus2020
A Baseline Measurement of Quality of Life in 322 Adults With Osteogenesis Imperfecta.
Article in JBMR plus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quality of life of pediatric and adult individuals with osteogenesis imperfecta: a meta-analysis.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023Pooled it
- Systematic review of health related-quality of life in adults with osteogenesis imperfecta.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023Pooled it
- Health-Related Quality of Life and Fatigue in Patients with Osteogenesis Imperfecta.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Oral health-related quality of life in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta in Taiwan.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Article
- Health-related quality of life in individuals with osteogenesis imperfecta in the United States: a cross-sectional study.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Article
- Osteogenesis Imperfecta: Skeletal and Non-skeletal Challenges in Adulthood.Calcified tissue international · 2024Review
- The IMPACT Survey: the humanistic impact of osteogenesis imperfecta in adults.BMC public health · 2024Article
- The IMPACT survey: a mixed methods study to understand the experience of children, adolescents and adults with osteogenesis imperfecta and their caregivers.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- "Osteogenesis Imperfecta Patients Wish Orthopedic Surgeons Had Better Strategies to Help with…"-Results of a Patient and Parent-Oriented Survey.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Transition from Pediatric to Adult Health Care in Osteogenesis Imperfecta.Current osteoporosis reports · 2023Review
- The patient clinical journey and socioeconomic impact of osteogenesis imperfecta: a systematic scoping review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023Article
- Transition of young adults with metabolic bone diseases to adult care.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- Patient-reported outcomes in a Chinese cohort of osteogenesis imperfecta unveil psycho-physical stratifications associated with clinical manifestations.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2022Article
- Prevalence and Hospital Admissions in Patients With Osteogenesis Imperfecta in The Netherlands: A Nationwide Registry Study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- Eat, breathe, sleep with Osteogenesis Imperfecta.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is characterized by bone fragility and secondary features such as blue sclerae, dentinogenesis imperfecta, hearing loss, ligamentous laxity, and short stature. It was thought that health-related quality of life (QoL) in patients with OI mainly depends on the severity of the skeletal deformities. However, it has become clear that additional factors can affect the QoL in all patients with OI. In this study, we compare dimensions of QoL in adults with OI with a control population. The SF-36 questionnaire was distributed among 330 adult patients with different OI types. Results were compared with two control populations from the Netherlands. Age-matched comparisons were made with one of the two control populations. The results were summarized in eight domains: general and mental health, physical and social function, bodily pain, vitality, and physical and emotional role. General health and physical function in all types of OI are low compared with controls, except patients with OI type 4 aged 55+ years. Bodily pain in patients with OI appeared significantly worse than in the control population. There was no significant difference between OI types regarding pain and vitality. Vitality was only in the OI type 1 group significantly lower compared with controls. Patients with OI type 1 had a significantly reduced mental health. Social functioning appeared most effective in type 3 around 20 years of age. QoL in adult patients with OI should be an important outcome measure in every OI clinic, but the amount of baseline data on this subject is sparse. This baseline measurement study is the largest study to date investigating QoL in adult patients with OI. The mean scores indicate that people with OI generally have a significantly lower QoL than the control population. Further qualitative evaluation of QoL and its influences is important for future management. © 2020 The Authors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.