Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33354630›Full record

ArticleReproductive biomedicine & society online2021

'A caesarean section is like you've never delivered a baby': A mixed methods study of the experience of childbirth among French women.

Clémence Schantz, Anne-Charlotte Pantelias, Myriam de Loenzien, Marion Ravit, Patrick Rozenberg, Christine Louis-Sylvestre, Sophie Goyet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive biomedicine & society online, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Women's assessment of the quality of hospital-based perinatal care by mode of birth in Romania during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from the IMAgiNE EURO study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Clémence SchantzCentre d'Etude des Mouvements Sociaux, CNRS/EHESS FRE2023 - INSERM U1276, Paris, France.
Anne-Charlotte PanteliasÉcole de Sages-Femmes de Suresnes, Hôpital Foch, Université de Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, UFR des Sciences de la Santé Simone Veil, Suresnes, France.
Myriam de LoenzienCentre Population et Développement, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement et Université de Paris, INSERM ERL 1244, Paris, France.
Marion RavitCentre Population et Développement, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement et Université de Paris, INSERM ERL 1244, Paris, France.
Patrick RozenbergVersailles St-Quentin University, Research Unit EA 7285, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.
Christine Louis-SylvestreDépartement Mère Enfant, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France.
Sophie GoyetIndependent Researcher, Annecy-le-Vieux, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The experience of childbirth has been technologized worldwide, leading to major social changes. In France, childbirth occurs almost exclusively in hospitals. Few studies have been published on the opinions of French women regarding obstetric technology and, in particular, caesarean section. In 2017-2018, we used a mixed methods approach to determine French women's preferences regarding the mode of delivery, and captured their experiences and satisfaction in relation to childbirth in two maternity settings. Of 284 pregnant women, 277 (97.5%) expressed a preference for vaginal birth, while seven (2.5%) women expressed a preference for caesarean section. Vaginal birth was also preferred among 26 women who underwent an in-depth interview. Vaginal birth was perceived as more natural, less risky and less painful, and to favour mother-child bonding. This vision was shared by caregivers. The women who expressed a preference for vaginal birth tended to remain sexually active late in their pregnancy, to find sexual intercourse pleasurable, and to believe that vaginal birth would not enlarge their vagina. A large majority (94.5%) of women who gave birth vaginally were satisfied with their childbirth experience, compared with 24.3% of those who underwent caesarean section. The caring attitude of the caregivers contributed to increasing this satisfaction. The notion of women's 'empowerment' emerged spontaneously in women's discourse in this research: women who gave birth vaginally felt satisfied and empowered. The vision shared by caregivers and women that vaginal birth is a natural process contributes to the stability of caesarean section rates in France.

Indexed as

biomedicalizationbiotechnologychildbirthgendersatisfactionsexuality

Identifiers

PMID33354630
PMCPMC7744624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.