ArticleBioMed research international2020
Different Genotype Distribution of Human Papillomavirus between Cervical and Esophageal Cancers: A Study in Both High-Incidence Areas, Xinjiang, China.
Article in BioMed research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- HPV prevalence in esophageal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Pooled it
- Biomarkers for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and the role of HPV: Multi‑omics approaches and current evidence (Review).International journal of oncology · 2026Review
- Prevalence of Human Papillomavirus Genotypes in Tehran, Iran.Journal of research in health sciences · 2022Article
- Portrayals of 2v, 4v and 9vHPV vaccines on Chinese social media: a content analysis of hot posts on Sina Weibo.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to reveal the certain human papillomavirus (HPV) genotype distribution between cervical cancer and esophageal cancer in the both high-incidence geographic regions. For this study, we collected and detected the infection of HPV in 120 paraffin-embedded esophageal tissues and 152 paraffin-embedded cervical tissues, respectively. The esophageal tissues include 40 normal epithelium (ENOR), 26 dysplasia (DYS), and 54 invasive squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The cervical tissues consisted of 40 normal epithelium (CNOR), 53 intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), and 59 invasive squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC). Both esophageal and cervical tissues collected in this study came from the same area, in which both the ESCC and CSCC were in high incidence, Xinjiang province, China. HPV GenoArray test kits were served to analyze the HPV infection. The result shows that among the 59 CSCC tissues, the total infection rate of HPV was 98.3% (58/59). The positive rate of HPV-16 infection was 63.8% (37/58). It indicated that HPV-16 is the most common infection among all of the high-risk HPV. The multiple infection rate was 19.0% (11/58). Among the 54 ESCC, a total of 7 genotypes were detected. The total infection rate of HPV was 61.1% (33/54). The positive rate of HPV-16 infection was 63.6% (21/33). The multiple infection rate was 6.1% (2/33). Our result shows that high-risk-type HPV-16 was associated with both cervical cancer and esophageal cancer, which play a role in the high-incidence area in Xinjiang. We hope that our results could point out the direction for the treatment strategy of HPV-associated cancer, cervical cancer, and esophageal cancer and for the application of HPV vaccines in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.