ArticleMethodsX2021
Machine learning, waveform preprocessing and feature extraction methods for classification of acoustic startle waveforms.
Article in MethodsX, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Universal automated classification of the acoustic startle reflex using machine learning.Hearing research · 2023Article
- College English Reading Teaching Integrating Production Oriented Approach from the Perspective of Artificial Intelligence.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The acoustic startle response (ASR) is an involuntary muscle reflex that occurs in response to a transient loud sound and is a highly-utilized method of assessing hearing status in animal models. Currently, a high level of variability exists in the recording and interpretation of ASRs due to the lack of standardization for collecting and analyzing these measures. An ensembled machine learning model was trained to predict whether an ASR waveform is a startle or non-startle using highly-predictive features extracted from normalized ASR waveforms collected from young adult CBA/CaJ mice. Features were extracted from the normalized waveform as well as the power spectral density estimates and continuous wavelet transforms of the normalized waveform. Machine learning models utilizing methods from different families of algorithms were individually trained and then ensembled together, resulting in an extremely robust model.•ASR waveforms were normalized using the mean and standard deviation computed before the startle elicitor was presented•9 machine learning algorithms from 4 different families of algorithms were individually trained using features extracted from the normalized ASR waveforms•Trained machine learning models were ensembled to produce an extremely robust classifier.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.