Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33354490›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2020

ParkIndex: Validation and application of a pragmatic measure of park access and use.

Andrew T Kaczynski, S Morgan Hughey, Ellen W Stowe, Marilyn E Wende, J Aaron Hipp, Elizabeth L Oliphant, Jasper Schipperijn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrew T KaczynskiDepartment of Health Promotion, Education and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, United States.
S Morgan HugheyDepartment of Health and Human Performance, College of Charleston, United States.
Ellen W StoweDepartment of Health Promotion, Education and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, United States.
Marilyn E WendeDepartment of Health Promotion, Education and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, United States.
J Aaron HippDepartment of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism Management, NC State University, United States.
Elizabeth L OliphantDepartment of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism Management, NC State University, United States.
Jasper SchipperijnUniversity of Southern Denmark, Denmark.

Funding

ParkIndex: A tool for advancing parks and public health research and practiceR21CA202693 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI KACZYNSKI, ANDREW · 2016 to 2017
$353k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA202693
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Composite metrics integrating park availability, features, and quality for a given address or neighborhood are lacking. The purposes of this study were to describe the validation, application, and demonstration of ParkIndex in four diverse communities. This study occurred in Fall 2018 in 128 census block groups within Seattle(WA), Brooklyn(NY), Raleigh(NC), and Greenville County(SC). All parks within a half-mile buffer were audited to calculate a composite park quality score, and select households provided data about use of proximal parks via an online, map-based survey. For each household, the number of parks, total park acreage, and average park quality score within one half-mile were calculated using GIS. Logistic regression was used to identify a parsimonious model predicting park use. ParkIndex values (representing the probability of park use) were mapped for all study areas and after scenarios involving the addition and renovation/improvement of parks. Out of 360 participants, 23.3% reported visiting a park within the past 30 days. The number of parks (OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.15-1.62), total park acreage (OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.07-1.19), and average park quality score (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.01-1.06) within one half-mile were all associated with park use. Composite ParkIndex values across the study areas ranged from 0 to 100. Hypothetical additions of or renovations to study area parks resulted in ParkIndex increases of 22.7% and 19.2%, respectively. ParkIndex has substantial value for park and urban planners, citizens, and researchers as a common metric to facilitate awareness, decision-making, and intervention planning related to park access, environmental justice, and community health.

Indexed as

MeasurementNeighborhoodParkPark use

Identifiers

PMID33354490
PMCPMC7744752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.