ArticleCureus2020
Factors That Impact the Psychological Wellbeing of Airborne Isolated Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Lower respiratory tract infections are one of the international leading causes of lost disability-adjusted years, and hence prevention measures, including isolation of high-suspect patients, were established to reduce the risk of transmission. However, isolation can negatively affect the psychological health of isolated patients, leading to anxiety or depression. The study aim was to investigate the association between types of isolation and the levels of anxiety and depression. Other factors that negatively influence the psychological status were identified. Methods This was an observational analytical cross-sectional study. The study included patients aged 18 years and above who had been isolated for at least 48 hours at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Jeddah, in the western region of Saudi Arabia. The data was gathered by interviewing the patients using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Results Among the included 97 isolated patients, 52 (53%) were men, and 45 (47%) were women with a mean age of 49.39 ± 1.87. Among all participants, 70% were married, and 72% had children. The means of anxiety and depression scores were 5.08 ± 0.39 and 7.48 ± 0.40, respectively. There was no significant association between HADS and types of isolation (P=0.550). Female gender was significantly associated with abnormal HADS (36% vs. 17%; P=0.040). On the other hand, the frequency of physician follow-up visits reduced the risk for abnormal HADS (22% vs. 50%; P=0.040) Conclusion Just over one-fourth of the isolated patients had raised anxiety or depression scores. A trend to higher HADS was observed in airborne isolated patients. We found also that females were more susceptible to anxiety and depression, while frequent physician visits improved the psychological wellbeing of isolated patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.