ArticleCureus2020
Decomplexifying Serum and Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Serologic Testing of Neurosyphilis: A Case Report of Ocular Syphilis and Highlights of the Principles of Serologic Testing.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Syphilitic uveitis in HIV-positive patients: report of a case series, treatment outcomes, and comprehensive review of the literature.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Serologic tests for syphilis can be quite complex. The screening and confirmatory tests, which number at least eight, are mathematically interpreted as a total of 16 possible combinations, if we choose one test from each of two sets of four. However, this bewildering complexity is simplified if we apply certain principles. We reiterate and propose four axioms. First, we distinguish between treponemal versus non-treponemal tests. The former, the treponemal test, is specific for the spirochete, treponema pallidum, and is used as a confirmatory test. It rarely declines over time. The latter, the non-treponemal test, is a screening test and reflects treponemal or tissue damage, is reported as a titer, and is used to monitor disease activity. We usually need both for screening and confirmatory diagnostic testing. Secondly, for rapid plasma reagin (RPR) tests, a non-treponemal serology test titer of at least 1:8 is suggestive of syphilis, but not necessarily neurosyphilis. A false-negative test usually registers below this dilution level and may be due to the "prozone phenomenon". Serum RPR titers are usually greater than 1:32. Thirdly, a negative treponemal test in the cerebrospinal fluid excludes neurosyphilis and a positive test is highly sensitive but lacks specificity, usually due to blood contamination. Most patients with neurosyphilis will have a positive non-treponemal test in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) with elevated protein and pleocytosis. Fourthly, a serological cure is defined as at least a four-fold decline in a non-treponemal test titer at three and six months, or a persistently low titer after treatment. Patients who do not fulfill these criteria are known as "serofast". We describe the case of a 38-year-old man with human immunodeficiency virus-type 1 who developed bilateral optic disc edema with photopsias and transient visual obscurations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.