ArticleCureus2020
The Rates of Cesarean Section Deliveries According to Robson Classification System During the Year of 2018 Among Patients in King Abdul-Aziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of virtual reality on anxiety, stress, and hemodynamic parameters during cesarean section: A randomized controlled clinical trial.Saudi medical journal · 2022Trial
- Clinicians' Personal Delivery Preference and Decision-Making for Cesarean Delivery: A Survey of Obstetricians and Midwives.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- Exploring barriers and facilitators of vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC), awareness, and preferences among females in Western Saudi Arabia.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
- Prevalence and Contributors to Caesarean Section Rates at Maternity and Children's Hospital, Qassim, Based on Robson Groups.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2025Article
- Incidence of Surgical Site Infection Following Cesarean Section and Its Associated Factors in a Hospital of the Eastern Region, Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Multiple Cesarean Section Outcomes and Complications: A Retrospective Study in Jazan, Saudi Arabia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Mode of delivery preferences: the role of childbirth fear among nulliparous women.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Prediction of Emergency Cesarean Section Using Detectable Maternal and Fetal Characteristics Among Saudi Women.International journal of women's health · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe rate of cesarean section (CS) births has been rapidly increasing in Saudi Arabia during the last two decades. Using the Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) to classify and analyze the causes of the high CS rate.
objectiveTo assess the increasing rates of CS by the implementation of the Robson TGCS on all CS births in our chosen population. STUDY
designAn observational, cross-sectional study conducted among all deliveries at the King Abdul-Aziz Medical City (KAMC), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia during most of 2018. Over the study period, 3168 births were enrolled in the study.
resultsThe analysis of 3168 births, where 870 women gave birth through CS, resulted in a CS rate of 27.5%. The three major TGCS which contributed to the CS rate were group 5, 2 (divided into 2A and 2B), and 3. Class 5 (Previous CS, single cephalic, ≥37 weeks) contributed the most to the CS rate by 36.5%. Followed by Class 2 (divided into 2A; nulliparous, singleton, cephalic, ≥37 weeks, induced labor and 2B; nulliparous, singleton, ≥37, pre-labor CS) which contributed by 12.9%. Class 3 (multiparous (no previous CS), singleton, ≥37 weeks, spontaneous labor) was the third-highest contributing group by 9.2%. Women who gave birth spontaneously and vaginally were 1403 (44.3%) where women whose labor was induced were 1286 (40.6%).
conclusionThe CS rate in KAMC was 27.5%. After classifying these patients according to the TGCS, Class 5 had the largest percentage of patients going for CS (36.2%). While they are individually low together, Robson classes from Class 1 to 4 (which are considered as low-risk classes) were responsible for 37.8% of the patients going for CS. Since the previously mentioned groups are considered low-risk they should be targeted by health institutions to reduce the CS rate. Improved education of nulliparous and multiparous women who never underwent a CS to prevent nonmedically indicated CS is in order, to preclude repeated CS births in the future and further increase the CS rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.