Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33354347›Full record

ReviewObesity science & practice2020

College campuses' influence on student weight and related behaviours: A review of observational and intervention research.

Caitlin P Bailey, Shanti Sharma, Christina D Economos, Erin Hennessy, Caitlin Simon, Daniel P Hatfield

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Obesity science & practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Is there a difference in student physical activity between a field school and a traditional classroom setting?American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Caitlin P BaileyChildObesity180, The Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy Tufts University Boston Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6141-6673
Shanti SharmaChildObesity180, The Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy Tufts University Boston Massachusetts USA.
Christina D EconomosChildObesity180, The Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy Tufts University Boston Massachusetts USA.
Erin HennessyChildObesity180, The Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy Tufts University Boston Massachusetts USA.
Caitlin SimonPartnership for a Healthier America Washington District of Columbia USA.
Daniel P HatfieldChildObesity180, The Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy Tufts University Boston Massachusetts USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research indicates that most college students are not meeting dietary and physical activity guidelines, and the average student gains an estimated 1.6-3.0 kg during 4 years of study. College administrations are well-positioned to influence student weight-related health behaviours by ensuring that campus environments/policies promote health. However, to date, campus health interventions have largely addressed individual and interpersonal factors rather than environmental/policy-level changes. Using an ecological perspective, this narrative review synthesizes the literature on campus environmental/policy-level factors (e.g., food availability, physical activity requirements) associated with student diet, physical activity and weight, as well as campus interventions to address these factors. Web of Science and PubMed databases were searched between December 2018 and November 2019. Results indicate that campus food environments may contribute to overconsumption and weight gain, and the number of campuses requiring students to participate in physical activity courses is in decline. Eight examples of environmental/policy-level campus interventions are presented: nutrition labels in dining halls, campus-wide healthy choice marketing campaigns, restricted payment methods for à la cart dining, trayless dining, health-themed residence halls, peer health education programmes, active classroom spaces and physical activity course requirements. Implications for research and health promotion programmes/policies in the field of college health are discussed.

Indexed as

collegenutritionphysical activityweight

Identifiers

PMID33354347
PMCPMC7746970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.