Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33354345›Full record

ArticleObesity science & practice2020

Comparison of mindful and slow eating strategies on acute energy intake.

Anna Peluso Simonson, Kelliann Kathleen Davis, Bethany Barone Gibbs, Elizabeth Mary Venditti, John Michael Jakicic

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity science & practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of mindfulness-based interventions on obesogenic eating behaviors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Time-varying eating behaviors and long-term risk of incident hypertension in a Japanese cohort.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna Peluso SimonsonDepartment of Exercise Science and Sport Studies John Carroll University University Heights Ohio USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6074-0447
Kelliann Kathleen DavisDepartment of Health and Human Development University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
Bethany Barone GibbsDepartment of Health and Human Development University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
Elizabeth Mary VendittiDepartment of Psychiatry University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
John Michael JakicicHealthy Lifestyle Institute University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6800-9368
University of Pittsburgh · USJohn Carroll University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mindfulness and slow eating techniques are commonly recommended to achieve weight loss within behavioural weight management programmes; yet the role of these eating strategies on acute energy intake (EI) and satiety are not clear. This study investigated the effects of mindful and slow eating strategies on acute EI and satiety. Twenty-four participants were randomized to one of three eating conditions (EAT, MIND, SLOW). For the EAT condition, participants were instructed to eat as they normally would for both test meal sessions. For the SLOW condition, participants were instructed to eat as they normally would for their first test meal session and to slow their eating for the second test meal session. For the MIND condition, participants were instructed to eat as they normally would during their first test meal session and were given brief instructions on mindful eating for their second test meal session. For each condition, participants were provided ad libitum access to a test meal, and EI was calculated based upon food consumed. Participants rated their level of satiety following each meal. There were no significant differences in EI between eating strategy conditions. There was a trend towards a decrease in energy intake in the MIND condition compared with the EAT condition and a prevention of increased intake in the SLOW condition. There were no significant differences in ratings of satiety between conditions. Although, neither mindful nor slow eating strategies significantly decreased acute EI or satiety; the results suggest that both strategies blunted the increase in EI observed in EAT that occurred across two eating episodes, which may suggest that these strategies can be important for modifying eating behaviour that may contribute to body weight regulation. Additional appropriately designed studies investigating these strategies appear warranted to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

eating strategiesenergy intakemindfulnessslow eating

Identifiers

PMID33354345
PMCPMC7746965
OpenAlexW3042623405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.