Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33354343›Full record

ArticleObesity science & practice2020

Teaching families to manage intake of candy in the home: Results from a feasibility study using multiphase optimization strategy (MOST).

J S Savage, E L Adams, B Y Rollins, J A Bleser, M E Marini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity science & practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J S SavageCenter for Childhood Obesity Research Penn State University University Park Pennsylvania USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2912-8687
E L AdamsCenter for Childhood Obesity Research Penn State University University Park Pennsylvania USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5602-8470
B Y RollinsCenter for Childhood Obesity Research Penn State University University Park Pennsylvania USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1077-3886
J A BleserCenter for Childhood Obesity Research Penn State University University Park Pennsylvania USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7787-6225
M E MariniCenter for Childhood Obesity Research Penn State University University Park Pennsylvania USA.
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExcess intake of desserts/sweets high in added sugars, such as candy, is linked with greater obesity risk. Parents often limit their childrens' intake of these sweet foods using controlling feeding practices, such as restriction; yet, restrictive feeding practices are counterproductive for childrens' self-regulation of energy intake.

objectiveThis study developed a family-based behavioural intervention that taught parents alternatives to restrictive feeding practices and encouraged children to consume candy in moderation.

methodsUsing the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST), parent-child dyads (

resultsRetention rate at follow-up was high (95%). Among parents who received parent shared decision making, 86.4% reported the structured-based candy routine they set with their child was easy to follow. Most children reported child mindfulness (95%) and attention control (89.5%) strategies were easy to play. Children recalled 4.1 ± 1.8 of the six mindfulness strategies and 2.7 ± 1.6 of the five attention control strategies at follow-up. Eating in the absence of hunger tended to be lower for children who received parent shared decision making and child mindfulness components.

conclusionThis intervention was feasible and well-implemented in the home environment. Findings will inform future, larger interventions designed to test similar strategies on childrens; eating behaviours and self-regulation.

Indexed as

child appetite regulationcontrolling feeding practicesfood restrictionstructure‐based parenting

Identifiers

PMID33354343
PMCPMC7746962
OpenAlexW3045809074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.