ArticleObesity science & practice2020
A cross-sectional analysis of physical activity and weight misreporting in diverse populations: The Seattle Obesity Study III.
Article in Obesity science & practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nutrition and rare diseases: a case study of patients with acute intermittent porphyria (AIP).Nutrition & metabolism · 2025Article
- Article
- Investigating the effects of rurality on stress, subjective well-being, and weight-related outcomes.Wellbeing, space and society · 2023Article
- Associations between neighborhood built environment, residential property values, and adult BMI change: The Seattle Obesity Study III.SSM - population health · 2022Article
- Infancy Dietary Patterns, Development, and Health: An Extensive Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Associations between socioeconomic status and physical activity among older adults: cross-sectional results from the OUTDOOR ACTIVE study.BMC geriatrics · 2022Article
- Article
- From the clinic to the community: Can health system data accurately estimate population obesity prevalence?Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2021Article
- Some Ultra-Processed Foods Are Needed for Nutrient Adequate Diets: Linear Programming Analyses of the Seattle Obesity Study.Nutrients · 2021Article
- Inedible Food Waste Linked to Diet Quality and Food Spending in the Seattle Obesity Study SOS III.Nutrients · 2021Article
- A cross-sectional analysis of physical activity and weight misreporting in diverse populations: The Seattle Obesity Study III.Obesity science & practice · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn-person assessments of physical activity (PA) and body weight can be burdensome for participants and cost prohibitive for researchers. This study examined self-reported PA and weight accuracy and identified patterns of misreporting in a diverse sample.
methodsKing, Pierce and Yakima county residents, aged 21-59 years (
resultsMVPA underreporting was higher among males and college educated participants; however, there was no differential MVPA overreporting. Weight underreporting was higher among males, those age 40-49 years and persons with obesity. Weight overreporting was higher among Hispanic participants and those reporting stress, unhappiness and fair or poor health. The estimated PA-obesity relation was similar using measured and self-reported PA but not self-reported weight. Perceived PA and weight predicted measured values.
conclusionSelf-reported PA and weight may be useful should objective measurement be infeasible; however, though population-specific adjustment for differential reporting should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.