Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33354279›Full record

ArticleOxidative medicine and cellular longevity2020

Topical Application of Fibroblast Growth Factor 10-PLGA Microsphere Accelerates Wound Healing via Inhibition of ER Stress.

Ke Xu, Bo Chai, Kailun Zhang, Jun Xiong, Yiru Zhu, Jingyu Xu, Ningchen An, Weidong Xia, Hao Ji, Yanqing Wu and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Application of Biomedical Microspheres in Wound Healing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ke XuSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Wound Repair and Regeneration Key Laboratory, Cixi Biomedical Research Institute, Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5202-3245
Bo ChaiSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Wound Repair and Regeneration Key Laboratory, Cixi Biomedical Research Institute, Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2346-5292
Kailun ZhangThe Institute of Life Sciences, Engineering Laboratory of Zhejiang Province for Pharmaceutical Development of Growth Factors, Biomedical Collaborative Innovation Center of Wenzhou, Wenzhou University, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9147-5006
Jun XiongSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Wound Repair and Regeneration Key Laboratory, Cixi Biomedical Research Institute, Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2598-0706
Yiru ZhuSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Wound Repair and Regeneration Key Laboratory, Cixi Biomedical Research Institute, Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1751-9515
Jingyu XuThe Institute of Life Sciences, Engineering Laboratory of Zhejiang Province for Pharmaceutical Development of Growth Factors, Biomedical Collaborative Innovation Center of Wenzhou, Wenzhou University, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3508-3566
Ningchen AnSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Wound Repair and Regeneration Key Laboratory, Cixi Biomedical Research Institute, Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6409-6812
Weidong XiaDepartment of Burn, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0935-4289
Hao JiThe Institute of Life Sciences, Engineering Laboratory of Zhejiang Province for Pharmaceutical Development of Growth Factors, Biomedical Collaborative Innovation Center of Wenzhou, Wenzhou University, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2371-6098
Yanqing WuThe Institute of Life Sciences, Engineering Laboratory of Zhejiang Province for Pharmaceutical Development of Growth Factors, Biomedical Collaborative Innovation Center of Wenzhou, Wenzhou University, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6535-6655
Hao LiDepartment of Orthopedics Surgery, Lishui People's Hospital, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1717-8302
Jian XiaoSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Wound Repair and Regeneration Key Laboratory, Cixi Biomedical Research Institute, Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7374-6506
Zhiguo FengSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Wound Repair and Regeneration Key Laboratory, Cixi Biomedical Research Institute, Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9642-4099
Hongyu ZhangSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Wound Repair and Regeneration Key Laboratory, Cixi Biomedical Research Institute, Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1412-5659
Wenzhou Medical University · CNWenzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a high incidence of acute and chronic skin defects caused by various reasons in clinically practice. The repair and functional reconstruction of skin defects have become a major clinical problem, which needs to be solved urgently. Previous studies have shown that fibroblast growth factor 10 (FGF10) plays a functional role in promoting the proliferation, migration, and differentiation of epithelial cells. However, little is known about the effect of FGF10 on the recovery process after skin damage. In this study, we found that the expression of endogenous FGF10 was increased during wound healing. We prepared FGF10-loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (FGF10-PLGA) microspheres, and it could sustain release of FGF10 both in vitro and in vivo, accelerating wound healing. Further analysis revealed that compared with FGF10 alone, FGF10-PLGA microspheres significantly improved granulation formation, collagen synthesis, cell proliferation, and blood vessel density. In the meantime, we found that FGF10-PLGA microspheres inhibited the expression of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress markers. Notably, activating ER stress with tunicamycin (TM) reduced therapeutic effects of FGF10-PLGA microspheres in wound healing, whereas inhibition of ER stress with 4-phenyl butyric acid (4-PBA) improved the function of FGF10-PLGA microspheres. Taken together, this study indicates that FGF10-PLGA microspheres accelerate wound healing presumably through modulating ER stress.

Indexed as

MicrospheresWounds and InjuriesAdministration, TopicalAnimalsEndoplasmic Reticulum StressFibroblast Growth Factor 10MaleMiceMice, Inbred ICRPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid CopolymerWound HealingFgf10 protein, mouseFibroblast Growth Factor 10Polylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer

Identifiers

PMID33354279
PMCPMC7735840
OpenAlexW3112389538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.