Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33353866›Full record

ArticleUrologic oncology2021

Oncologic and patient-reported outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men aged ≥75 years.

Kyo Togashi, Shingo Hatakeyama, Teppei Okamoto, Yuta Kojima, Hiromichi Iwamura, Naoki Fujita, Takuma Narita, Itsuto Hamano, Tomoko Hamaya, Tohru Yoneyama and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Urologic oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kyo TogashiDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Shingo HatakeyamaDepartment of Advanced Blood Purification Therapy, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan. Electronic address: shingoh@hirosaki-u.ac.jp.
Teppei OkamotoDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Yuta KojimaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Hiromichi IwamuraDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Naoki FujitaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Takuma NaritaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Itsuto HamanoDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Tomoko HamayaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Tohru YoneyamaDepartment of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Hayato YamamotoDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Takahiro YoneyamaDepartment of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Yasuhiro HashimotoDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Chikara OhyamaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan; Department of Advanced Blood Purification Therapy, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan; Department of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Hirosaki University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe present study aimed to evaluate oncologic outcomes, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and frailty in older adult patients aged ≥75 years who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study reviewed the medical records of 752 patients who underwent RARP from July 2011 to May 2020. The PROs were evaluated by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite questionnaire at baseline and 1 year after RARP. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to age at RARP: <70, 70-74, and ≥75 years. Oncologic outcomes and PROs were compared between the ≥75 and 70-74 years groups and between the ≥75 and <70 years groups.

resultsMedian follow up was 47 months. Of the 752 patients, 469, 216, and 74 were classified into the <70, 70-74, and ≥75 years groups, respectively. No significant differences were observed in the biochemical recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival among the groups. No significant differences were observed in the PROs and pad-free rates at baseline and 1 year after RARP among the groups. The full satisfaction (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite score = 100) at 12 months after RARP was significantly higher in the ≥75 years group (27%) than in the <70 years group (15%, P = 0.045).

conclusionThe oncologic outcomes and PROs in select patients with prostate cancer aged ≥75 years were feasible and acceptable with RARP.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMaleProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresTreatment OutcomeOlder adultsPatient-reported outcomeProstate cancerProstatectomyRARPSurvival

Identifiers

PMID33353866
OpenAlexW3113485530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.