Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33353864›Full record

Trial reportUrologic oncology2021

Decision regret, adverse outcomes, and treatment choice in men with localized prostate cancer: Results from a multi-site randomized trial.

Donna L Berry, Fangxin Hong, Traci M Blonquist, Barbara Halpenny, Niya Xiong, Christopher P Filson, Viraj A Master, Martin G Sanda, Peter Chang, Gary W Chien and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Urologic oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01844999 (Personal Patient Profile - Prostate), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01844999 nacompletednot on this map

Personal Patient Profile - Prostate (P3P) II: Effectiveness-Implementation Trial in Diverse Health Care Networks

TypeinterventionalSponsorDana-Farber Cancer InstituteRan2013 to 2017Enrolled392ConditionsProstate CancerArmsPersonal Patient Profile - Prostate (P3P), Standard prostate cancer information websites
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Optimal assessment of quality of life for patients with prostate cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Donna L BerryDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA. Electronic address: donnalb@uw.edu.
Fangxin HongDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Traci M BlonquistDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Barbara HalpennyDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Niya XiongDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Christopher P FilsonDepartment of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory Healthcare, Atlanta, GA; Atlanta VA Medical Center, Decatur, GA.
Viraj A MasterDepartment of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory Healthcare, Atlanta, GA.
Martin G SandaDepartment of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Peter ChangBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Gary W ChienDepartment of Urology, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Randy A JonesUniversity of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, VA.
Tracey L KrupskiUniversity of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA.
Seth WolpinUniversity of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA.
Leslie WilsonDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Julia H HayesDana-Farber Cancer Institute at St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Quoc-Dien TrinhDepartment of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Mitchell SokoloffDepartment of Urology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worchester, MA.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USEmory University · USUniversity of Virginia · USAtlanta VA Medical Center · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USLos Angeles Medical Center · USSt. Elizabeth's Medical Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Personal Patient Profile-Prostate: Testing and Implementation in Health NetworksR01NR009692 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BERRY, DONNA L. · 2006 to 2015
$4.0M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR009692
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMen diagnosed with localized prostate cancer must navigate a highly preference-sensitive decision between treatment options with varying adverse outcome profiles. We evaluated whether use of a decision support tool previously shown to decrease decisional conflict also impacted the secondary outcome of post-treatment decision regret.

methodsParticipants were randomized to receive personalized decision support via the Personal Patient Profile-Prostate or usual care prior to a final treatment decision. Symptoms were measured just before randomization and 6 months later; decision regret was measured at 6 months along with records review to ascertain treatment choices. Regression modeling explored associations between baseline variables including race and D`Amico risk, study group, and 6-month variables regret, choice, and symptoms.

resultsAt 6 months, 287 of 392 (73%) men returned questionnaires of which 257 (89%) had made a treatment choice. Of that group, 201 of 257 (78%) completely answered the regret scale. Regret was not significantly different between participants randomized to the P3P intervention compared to the control group (P = 0.360). In univariate analyses, we found that Black men, men with hormonal symptoms, and men with bowel symptoms reported significantly higher decision regret (all P < 0.01). Significant interactions were detected between race and study group (intervention vs. usual care) in the multivariable model; use of the Personal Patient Profile-Prostate was associated with significantly decreased decisional regret among Black men (P = 0.037). Interactions between regret, symptoms and treatment revealed that (1) men choosing definitive treatment and reporting no hormonal symptoms reported lower regret compared to all others; and (2) men choosing active surveillance and reporting bowel symptoms had higher regret compared to all others.

conclusionThe Personal Patient Profile-Prostate decision support tool may be most beneficial in minimizing decisional regret for Black men considering treatment options for newly-diagnosed prostate cancer.

trial registrationNCT01844999.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorDecision Support TechniquesCombined Modality TherapyDecision MakingDelivery of Health CareEmotionsFollow-Up StudiesHumansLong Term Adverse EffectsMalePrognosisProstatic NeoplasmsSurveys and QuestionnairesDecision regretDecision support techniquesProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID33353864
PMCPMC8213859
OpenAlexW3116306991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.