Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33353800›Full record

ReviewTrends in cognitive sciences2021

How Beat Perception Co-opts Motor Neurophysiology.

Jonathan J Cannon, Aniruddh D Patel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Cortico-striatal network architecture shapes rhythmic biases in music.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Continuous Theta Burst to Supplementary Motor Area Modulates Groove.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jonathan J CannonDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. Electronic address: jcan@mit.edu.
Aniruddh D PatelDepartment of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA; Program in Brain, Mind, and Consciousness, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR), Toronto, CA. Electronic address: a.patel@tufts.edu.

Funding

Developing an animal model to study auditory-motor interactions during rhythm perceptionR21NS114682 · NINDS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI KAO, MIMI HSIAO FENG, PATEL, ANIRUDDH D · 2019 to 2019
$381k
NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS114682
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beat perception offers cognitive scientists an exciting opportunity to explore how cognition and action are intertwined in the brain even in the absence of movement. Many believe the motor system predicts the timing of beats, yet current models of beat perception do not specify how this is neurally implemented. Drawing on recent insights into the neurocomputational properties of the motor system, we propose that beat anticipation relies on action-like processes consisting of precisely patterned neural time-keeping activity in the supplementary motor area (SMA), orchestrated and sequenced by activity in the dorsal striatum. In addition to synthesizing recent advances in cognitive science and motor neuroscience, our framework provides testable predictions to guide future work.

Indexed as

Motor CortexMusicAuditory PerceptionHumansMovementNeurophysiologybasal gangliabeat perceptionmotor systemmusic cognitionsupplementary motor area

Identifiers

PMID33353800
PMCPMC9440376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.