Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33353762›Full record

ReviewClinical therapeutics2021

Regulatory Agilities in the Time of COVID-19: Overview, Trends, and Opportunities.

Winona Rei Bolislis, Maria Lucia de Lucia, Felipe Dolz, Runyi Mo, Makoto Nagaoka, Heraclio Rodriguez, May Li Woon, Wei Yu, Thomas C Kühler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical therapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Regulatory reliance pathways during health emergencies: enabling timely authorizations for COVID-19 vaccines in Latin America.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Future directions in regulatory affairs.Frontiers in medicine · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Winona Rei BolislisGlobal Regulatory Affairs, Sanofi R&D, Chilly Mazarin, France.
Maria Lucia de LuciaGlobal Regulatory Affairs, Sanofi R&D, Chilly Mazarin, France.
Felipe DolzGlobal Regulatory Affairs, Sanofi R&D, Chilly Mazarin, France.
Runyi MoGlobal Regulatory Affairs, Sanofi R&D, Chilly Mazarin, France.
Makoto NagaokaGlobal Regulatory Affairs, Sanofi R&D, Chilly Mazarin, France.
Heraclio RodriguezGlobal Regulatory Affairs, Sanofi R&D, Chilly Mazarin, France.
May Li WoonGlobal Regulatory Affairs, Sanofi R&D, Chilly Mazarin, France.
Wei YuGlobal Regulatory Affairs, Sanofi R&D, Chilly Mazarin, France.
Thomas C KühlerGlobal Regulatory Affairs, Sanofi R&D, Chilly Mazarin, France. Electronic address: thomas.kuhler@sanofi.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCrucial steps have been adopted by health and regulatory authorities around the world to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. This review aims to highlight these steps by providing an overview of the regulatory approaches adopted during the onset of the pandemic, provide an assessment of observed trends, and offer some reflections and proposals to leverage learnings and opportunities from this current pandemic.

methodsDocuments and informational materials on regulating the development and management of medical products during the COVID-19 pandemic were collected and classified. These materials were sourced from official websites and press releases from health authorities and international bodies from selected markets across the globe, and covered the period between January and July 2020. Additional information to support this study was gathered through a literature review and analysis of related data available from the public domain, and was complemented with the authors' personal experience.

findingsCommunication has been vital in addressing the impact of COVID-19. A total of 1705 documents and informational materials related to health or regulatory response to the COVID-19 pandemic were gathered. Of these, 343 (around 20%) were identified as regulatory agilities. These agile approaches were classified into 3 categories, namely, where health and regulatory authorities had: (1) facilitated product management across the entire lifecycle, notably in expediting medical product use for COVID-19, ensuring the continuity of clinical trials, and addressing supply chain issues; (2) strengthened international cooperation; and (3) addressed regulatory burden with the adoption of electronic and digital tools. IMPLICATIONS: While many regulatory measures have been introduced temporarily as a response to the COVID-19 crisis, there are opportunities for leveraging an understanding from these approaches in order to collectively achieve more efficient regulatory systems and to mitigate and address the impact of COVID-19 and further future-proof the regulatory environment.

Indexed as

CommunicationCOVID-19Device ApprovalDrug ApprovalPublic PolicyPublic-Private Sector PartnershipsCompassionate Use TrialsDrug and Narcotic ControlHealth PolicyHumansMedical Device LegislationPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Time FactorsagilitiesCOVID-19global responsepandemicregulatory science

Identifiers

PMID33353762
PMCPMC7703519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.