Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33353559›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2020

Accurate machine learning-based germination detection, prediction and quality assessment of three grain crops.

Nikita Genze, Richa Bharti, Michael Grieb, Sebastian J Schultheiss, Dominik G Grimm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Artificial neural network modeling for deciphering the in vitro induced salt stress tolerance in chickpea (Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2023
    Article
  16. Predicting Gene Regulatory Interactions Using Natural Genetic Variation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nikita GenzeTechnical University of Munich, TUM Campus Straubing for Biotechnology and Sustainability, Bioinformatics, Schulgasse 22, 94315, Straubing, Germany.
Richa BhartiTechnical University of Munich, TUM Campus Straubing for Biotechnology and Sustainability, Bioinformatics, Schulgasse 22, 94315, Straubing, Germany.
Michael GriebTechnology and Support Centre in the Centre of Excellence for Renewable Resources (TFZ), Schulgasse 20, 94315, Straubing, Germany.
Sebastian J SchultheissComputomics GmbH, Eisenbahnstr. 1, 72072, Tübingen, Germany.
Dominik G GrimmTechnical University of Munich, TUM Campus Straubing for Biotechnology and Sustainability, Bioinformatics, Schulgasse 22, 94315, Straubing, Germany. dominik.grimm@hswt.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2085-4591

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessment of seed germination is an essential task for seed researchers to measure the quality and performance of seeds. Usually, seed assessments are done manually, which is a cumbersome, time consuming and error-prone process. Classical image analyses methods are not well suited for large-scale germination experiments, because they often rely on manual adjustments of color-based thresholds. We here propose a machine learning approach using modern artificial neural networks with region proposals for accurate seed germination detection and high-throughput seed germination experiments.

resultsWe generated labeled imaging data of the germination process of more than 2400 seeds for three different crops, Zea mays (maize), Secale cereale (rye) and Pennisetum glaucum (pearl millet), with a total of more than 23,000 images. Different state-of-the-art convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures with region proposals have been trained using transfer learning to automatically identify seeds within petri dishes and to predict whether the seeds germinated or not. Our proposed models achieved a high mean average precision (mAP) on a hold-out test data set of approximately 97.9%, 94.2% and 94.3% for Zea mays, Secale cereale and Pennisetum glaucum respectively. Further, various single-value germination indices, such as Mean Germination Time and Germination Uncertainty, can be computed more accurately with the predictions of our proposed model compared to manual countings.

conclusionOur proposed machine learning-based method can help to speed up the assessment of seed germination experiments for different seed cultivars. It has lower error rates and a higher performance compared to conventional and manual methods, leading to more accurate germination indices and quality assessments of seeds.

Indexed as

Faster R-CNNGermination indicesGermination predictionMachine learningSeed germination

Identifiers

PMID33353559
PMCPMC7754596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.