Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33353539›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2020

Understanding personalized dynamics to inform precision medicine: a dynamic time warp analysis of 255 depressed inpatients.

K Hebbrecht, M Stuivenga, T Birkenhäger, M Morrens, E I Fried, B Sabbe, E J Giltay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. The Potential of Personalized Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Networks.Psychiatry and clinical psychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Clustering and drivers of symptoms observed at week six after antidepressant treatment in depressed outpatients.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Network dynamics of self-compassion, anxiety, and depression during eating disorder therapy.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

K HebbrechtCollaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute (CAPRI), Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Stationsstraat 22c, 2570, Duffel, Belgium. kaat.hebbrecht@emmaus.be.
M StuivengaCollaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute (CAPRI), Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Stationsstraat 22c, 2570, Duffel, Belgium.
T BirkenhägerCollaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute (CAPRI), Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Stationsstraat 22c, 2570, Duffel, Belgium.
M MorrensCollaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute (CAPRI), Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Stationsstraat 22c, 2570, Duffel, Belgium.
E I FriedDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Leiden University, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
B SabbeCollaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute (CAPRI), Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Stationsstraat 22c, 2570, Duffel, Belgium.
E J GiltayCollaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute (CAPRI), Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Stationsstraat 22c, 2570, Duffel, Belgium. E.J.Giltay@lumc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMajor depressive disorder (MDD) shows large heterogeneity of symptoms between patients, but within patients, particular symptom clusters may show similar trajectories. While symptom clusters and networks have mostly been studied using cross-sectional designs, temporal dynamics of symptoms within patients may yield information that facilitates personalized medicine. Here, we aim to cluster depressive symptom dynamics through dynamic time warping (DTW) analysis.

methodsThe 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-17) was administered every 2 weeks for a median of 11 weeks in 255 depressed inpatients. The DTW analysis modeled the temporal dynamics of each pair of individual HRSD-17 items within each patient (i.e., 69,360 calculated "DTW distances"). Subsequently, hierarchical clustering and network models were estimated based on similarities in symptom dynamics both within each patient and at the group level.

resultsThe sample had a mean age of 51 (SD 15.4), and 64.7% were female. Clusters and networks based on symptom dynamics markedly differed across patients. At the group level, five dynamic symptom clusters emerged, which differed from a previously published cross-sectional network. Patients who showed treatment response or remission had the shortest average DTW distance, indicating denser networks with more synchronous symptom trajectories.

conclusionsSymptom dynamics over time can be clustered and visualized using DTW. DTW represents a promising new approach for studying symptom dynamics with the potential to facilitate personalized psychiatric care.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesIndividualityAdultAgedCluster AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedPrecision MedicinePsychotherapyTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeCluster analysisInter-individual variationIntra-individual variationMajor depressive disorderRoutine outcome monitoringSymptom dynamicsSymptom trajectories

Identifiers

PMID33353539
PMCPMC7756914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.