ArticleJournal of primary care & community health
Subspecialization in Family Medicine: Opinions, Preferences, and Practices of Family Physicians in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Public perceptions toward primary care in Kuwait: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn recent years, family medicine (FM) has shown many changes, including the development of sub-specialization. This study aimed to explore the opinions, preferences, and practices of Saudi family physicians with regard to sub-specialization within family practice.
methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted from January to May 2018. Data were collected from 561 Saudi FM board-certified physicians and family medicine residents from all over SA via personal emails using a self-administered questionnaire consisting of questions aimed at examining participants' opinions, preferences, and practices with regard to sub-specialization in family practice.
resultsOnly 48 family doctors (20.2%) had the qualification of subspecialist. Diabetology was the most common clinical subspecialty. The majority of participants agreed with the statements in favor of sub-specialization in FM. About 73% approved of the idea of sub-specialization in FM, while 89% thought that sub-specialization would provide a source of expertise within the FM context. The most stated reasons to go for FM subspecialties were to earn more experience (65.1%), gain some sense of control of huge knowledge and skills of FM (53.7%), and earning extra money (47.8%).
conclusionsThis study revealed that majority of certified family physicians and FM residents in SA have positive attitude towards sub-specialization in FM and support the idea of sub-specialization to be practiced within the context of FM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.