Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33353398›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2021

CT imaging review of uncommon peritoneal-based neoplasms: beyond carcinomatosis.

Perry J Pickhardt, Alberto A Perez, Mohab M Elmohr, Khaled M Elsayes

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Perry J PickhardtThe University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Alberto A PerezThe University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Mohab M ElmohrDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Khaled M ElsayesDepartment of Abdominal Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USBaylor College of Medicine · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pathologic involvement of the peritoneum can result from a wide variety of conditions, including both neoplastic and non-neoplastic entities. Neoplastic involvement of the peritoneal ligaments, mesenteries, and spaces from malignant spread of epithelial cancers, termed peritoneal carcinomatosis, is frequently encountered at CT evaluation. However, a host of other more unusual benign and malignant neoplasms can manifest with peritoneal disease, including both primary and secondary peritoneal processes, many of which can closely mimic peritoneal carcinomatosis at CT. In this review, we discuss a wide array of unusual peritoneal-based neoplasms that can resemble the more common peritoneal carcinomatosis. Beyond reviewing the salient features for each of these entities, particular emphasis is placed on any specific clinical and CT imaging clues that may allow the interpreting radiologist to appropriately narrow the differential diagnosis and, in some cases, make an imaging-specific diagnosis.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, DifferentialHumansPeritoneal NeoplasmsPeritoneumTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID33353398
PMCPMC8011261
OpenAlexW3115767652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.