Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33353397›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2021

Usefulness of two-point Dixon T2-weighted imaging in thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy: comparison with conventional fat saturation imaging in fat suppression quality and staging performance.

Lu Chen, Hao Hu, Huan-Huan Chen, Wen Chen, Qian Wu, Fei-Yun Wu, Xiao-Quan Xu

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Peripheral CD3Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lu ChenDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Hao HuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Huan-Huan ChenDepartment of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Wen ChenDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Qian WuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Fei-Yun WuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xiao-Quan XuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Nanjing Medical University · CNJiangsu Province Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the two-point Dixon

methodsWe enrolled 37 thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO) patients and 15 healthy controls who underwent both coronal two-point Dixon and fat-sat

resultsTwo-point Dixon

conclusionCompared with conventional fat-sat technique, two-point Dixon ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Two-point Dixon

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleGraves OphthalmopathyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedOculomotor MusclesReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID33353397
PMCPMC7934300
OpenAlexW3116271842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.