ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2020
Confronting pitfalls of AI-augmented molecular dynamics using statistical physics.
Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dissecting Large-Scale Structural Transitions in Membrane Transporters Using Advanced Simulation Technologies.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025Review
- Calculating Protein-Ligand Residence Times through State Predictive Information Bottleneck Based Enhanced Sampling.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- One Descriptor to Fold Them All: Harnessing Intuition and Machine Learning to Identify Transferable Lasso Peptide Reaction Coordinates.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024Article
- Calculating Protein-Ligand Residence Times Through State Predictive Information Bottleneck based Enhanced Sampling.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Committor-Consistent Variational String Method.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2022Article
- Collective variable discovery in the age of machine learning: reality, hype and everything in between.RSC advances · 2022Review
- Accelerating All-Atom Simulations and Gaining Mechanistic Understanding of Biophysical Systems through State Predictive Information Bottleneck.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2022Article
- A Companion Guide to the String Method with Swarms of Trajectories: Characterization, Performance, and Pitfalls.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2022Article
- The Middle Science: Traversing Scale In Complex Many-Body Systems.ACS central science · 2021Article
- Multiscale Reweighted Stochastic Embedding: Deep Learning of Collective Variables for Enhanced Sampling.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI)-based approaches have had indubitable impact across the sciences through the ability to extract relevant information from raw data. Recently, AI has also found use in enhancing the efficiency of molecular simulations, wherein AI derived slow modes are used to accelerate the simulation in targeted ways. However, while typical fields where AI is used are characterized by a plethora of data, molecular simulations, per construction, suffer from limited sampling and thus limited data. As such, the use of AI in molecular simulations can suffer from a dangerous situation where the AI-optimization could get stuck in spurious regimes, leading to incorrect characterization of the reaction coordinate (RC) for the problem at hand. When such an incorrect RC is then used to perform additional simulations, one could start to deviate progressively from the ground truth. To deal with this problem of spurious AI-solutions, here, we report a novel and automated algorithm using ideas from statistical mechanics. It is based on the notion that a more reliable AI-solution will be one that maximizes the timescale separation between slow and fast processes. To learn this timescale separation even from limited data, we use a maximum caliber-based framework. We show the applicability of this automatic protocol for three classic benchmark problems, namely, the conformational dynamics of a model peptide, ligand-unbinding from a protein, and folding/unfolding energy landscape of the C-terminal domain of protein G. We believe that our work will lead to increased and robust use of trustworthy AI in molecular simulations of complex systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.