Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33353152›Full record

ArticleToxics2020

Bird Feces as Indicators of Metal Pollution: Pitfalls and Solutions.

Tapio Eeva, Nelli Raivikko, Silvia Espín, Pablo Sánchez-Virosta, Suvi Ruuskanen, Jouni Sorvari, Miia Rainio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tapio EevaDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0395-1536
Nelli RaivikkoDepartment of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.
Silvia EspínArea of Toxicology, Department of Socio-Sanitary Sciences, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3612-5353
Pablo Sánchez-VirostaArea of Toxicology, Department of Socio-Sanitary Sciences, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain.
Suvi RuuskanenDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland.
Jouni SorvariDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2668-7771
Miia RainioDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland.
University of Turku · FIUniversidad de Murcia · ESUniversity of Eastern Finland · FI

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades IJCI-2017-34653 (SE)Turku University Foundation 080561 (TE)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bird feces are commonly used as a proxy for measuring dietary metal exposure levels in wild populations. Our study aims to improve the reliability and repeatability of fecal metal measurements and gives some recommendations for sampling. First, we studied levels of variation in metallic element (arsenic, calcium, cadmium, cobalt, copper, nickel, lead) concentrations: temporal variation within an individual, among siblings in a brood and among-brood/spatial variation. Second, we explored the variation caused by dual composition (urate vs. feces) of bird droppings. Two sets of fresh fecal samples were collected from pied flycatcher (

Indexed as

bird fecescalciumheavy metalsmeasurement errorpied flycatcherrepeatabilityuric acid

Identifiers

PMID33353152
PMCPMC7767019
OpenAlexW3113133244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.