ReviewPharmaceutics2020
Nanovesicle-Mediated Delivery Systems for CRISPR/Cas Genome Editing.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- CRISPR/Cas‑based epigenome editing for osteogenic lineage commitment.Cell and tissue research · 2026Review
- An overview of CRISPR-artificial intelligence theranostics: Current and emerging applications.Biomaterials translational · 2026Review
- Transforming RNA-Based Gene Therapy with Innovative Nanocarriers for siRNA and miRNA Delivery.Current gene therapy · 2026Review
- A review of synergistic strategies in cancer therapy: resveratrol-loaded hydrogels for targeted and multimodal treatment.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Quantitative Analysis of Phosphorothioate Isomers in CRISPR sgRNA at Single-Residue Resolution Using Endonuclease Digestion Coupled with Liquid Chromatography Cyclic Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry (LC/cIMS).Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Viral and Non-Viral Systems to Deliver Gene Therapeutics to Clinical Targets.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Cross-Species Insights into Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: Provide an Alternative View on Research Advancement.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing for Tissue-Specific In Vivo Targeting: Nanomaterials and Translational Perspective.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- Strategies to target the cancer driver MYC in tumor cells.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Biomaterials-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 delivery: recent challenges and opportunities in gene therapy.Frontiers in chemistry · 2023Review
- Biopolymeric Prodrug Systems as Potential Antineoplastic Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Delivery of engineered extracellular vesicles with miR-29b editing system for muscle atrophy therapy.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2022Article
- Theragnostic application of nanoparticle and CRISPR against food-borne multi-drug resistant pathogens.Materials today. Bio · 2022Review
- Inherent and Composite Hydrogels as Promising Materials to Limit Antimicrobial Resistance.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Exploring nano-enabled CRISPR-Cas-powered strategies for efficient diagnostics and treatment of infectious diseases.Journal of nanostructure in chemistry · 2022Review
- Polyethyleneimine-Based Lipopolyplexes as Carriers in Anticancer Gene Therapies.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Exosome/Liposome-like Nanoparticles: New Carriers for CRISPR Genome Editing in Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Engineered EV-Mimetic Nanoparticles as Therapeutic Delivery Vehicles for High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer.Cancers · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome-editing technology has emerged as a potential tool for treating incurable diseases for which few therapeutic modalities are available. In particular, discovery of the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas system together with the design of single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs) has sparked medical applications of genome editing. Despite the great promise of the CRISPR/Cas system, its clinical application is limited, in large part, by the lack of adequate delivery technology. To overcome this limitation, researchers have investigated various systems, including viral and nonviral vectors, for delivery of CRISPR/Cas and sgRNA into cells. Among nonviral delivery systems that have been studied are nanovesicles based on lipids, polymers, peptides, and extracellular vesicles. These nanovesicles have been designed to increase the delivery of CRISPR/Cas and sgRNA through endosome escape or using various stimuli such as light, pH, and environmental features. This review covers the latest research trends in nonviral, nanovesicle-based delivery systems that are being applied to genome-editing technology and suggests directions for future progress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.