ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome analysis reveals a biased distribution of virulence and antibiotic resistance genes in the genusApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Fecal strains Enterococcus mundtii from wild ruminants, their safety and postbiotic potential.Veterinary research communications · 2025Article
- Antilisterial and antioxidant exopolysaccharide from Enterococcus faecium PCH.25 isolated from cow butter: characterization and probiotic potential.Archives of microbiology · 2024Article
- Bacteriocin production and technological properties of Enterococcus mundtii and Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from sheep and goat colostrum.Veterinary research communications · 2023Article
- Protective Cultures in Food Products: From Science to Market.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Screening of bacteriocin-producing dairyFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Antibacterial potential of commercial and wild lactic acid bacteria strains isolated from ovine and caprine raw milk againstFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- In Vitro Probiotic Characterization and Safety Assessment of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Raw Milk of Japanese-Saanen Goat (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Bacteriocin-Producing StrainFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Microbiome Associated with Slovak Raw Goat Milk, Trace Minerals, and Vitamin E Content.International journal of food science · 2022Article
- Effect of enterocins against methicillin-resistant animal-derived staphylococci.Veterinary research communications · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enterococci are lactic acid bacteria. Most of them can adapt well to the food system due to their salt and acid-tolerance. Moreover, many enterococcal species have been found to produce antimicrobial substances of proteinaceous character, i.e., bacteriocins/enterocins. In this study,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.