SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020
A Systematic Review of the Assessment of Support Needs in People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Supported Decision-Making Inventory: Psychometric Validation of the Catalan and Spanish Versions.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2026Article
- Trauma-informed practice for children and young people with intellectual disabilities: A scoping review.The British journal of educational psychology · 2026Article
- From rugby to basketball: a comparative analysis on the implementation of mixed ability.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Support needs assessment tool for people with disability wanting to participate in sport and exercise (SNAT-SE): Usability and acceptability testing.JSAMS plus · 2025Article
- Sex Trafficking Prevention for Youth With Disabilities: Network Analysis of Organizational Coordination.Research on social work practice · 2025Article
- Smart Accessibility and Quality of Life in Education: A Systematic Review of Adolescent Support and Universal Access.Cureus · 2025Review
- Family Caregiver Adaptation during the Transition to Adulthood of Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Support Needs of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Implications for Their Assessment.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Are They the Same for All People? Nurses' Knowledge about the Basic Human Needs of People with Disabilities.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Perceived Support Needs of School-Aged Young People on the Autism Spectrum and Their Caregivers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An evaluation of support needs is fundamental to the provision of services to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Services should be organized by considering the support that people need to improve their quality of life and enforce their rights as citizens. This systematic review is conducted to analyze the rigor and usefulness of the available standardized tools for assessing support needs, as well as the uses of their results. Several databases were consulted, including Web of Sciences, Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest Central, PsycInfo, ERIC, and CINAHL, and the 86 documents that met the review criteria were organized into four sections: (a) measurement tools, (b) descriptive/correlational studies, (c) predictive studies, and (d) interventions. The results showed that age, level of intellectual disability, adaptive behavior skills, the number and type of associated disabilities, and medical and behavioral needs affected the support needs of people with disabilities. Quality of life outcomes have been predicted by the individual's support needs, explaining a significant percentage of their variability. The findings are useful in guiding assessments and planning interventions. Further research should address the effectiveness of specific support strategies and the development of social policies and indicators for inclusion that involve assessing support needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.