Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33352946›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2020

Influence of Static Magnetic Field Stimulation on the Accuracy of Tachystoscopically Presented Line Bisection.

Hikari Kirimoto, Tatsunori Watanabe, Nami Kubo, Shota Date, Toru Sunagawa, Tatsuya Mima, Katsuya Ogata, Hisato Nakazono, Shozo Tobimatsu, Antonio Oliviero

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Static Magnetic Field Stimulation Enhances Shunting Inhibition via a SLC26 Family ClThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  5. Safety for Human MR Scanners at 7T.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hikari KirimotoDepartment of Sensorimotor Neuroscience, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 7348553, Japan.
Tatsunori WatanabeDepartment of Sensorimotor Neuroscience, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 7348553, Japan.
Nami KuboDepartment of Sensorimotor Neuroscience, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 7348553, Japan.
Shota DateDepartment of Analysis and Control of Upper Extremity Function, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 7348553, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6248-9329
Toru SunagawaDepartment of Analysis and Control of Upper Extremity Function, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 7348553, Japan.
Tatsuya MimaGraduate School of Core Ethics and Frontier Sciences, Ritsumeikan University, Kyoto 6038577, Japan.
Katsuya OgataDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, International University of Health and Welfare, Fukuoka 8318501, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7559-9615
Hisato NakazonoDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Fukuoka International University of Health and Welfare, Fukuoka 8140001, Japan.
Shozo TobimatsuDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Fukuoka International University of Health and Welfare, Fukuoka 8140001, Japan.
Antonio OlivieroFENNSI Group, Hospital Nacional de Paraple'jicos, SESCAM, 45071 Toledo, Spain.
Hiroshima University · JPFukuoka International University · JPRitsumeikan University · JPServicio de Salud de Castilla La Mancha · ES

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 19H01091Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 19H03977Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 20K19708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial static magnetic stimulation (tSMS) has been known to reduce human cortical excitability. Here, we investigated whether tSMS would modulate visuo-spatial cognition in healthy humans. Subjects performed a visuo-spatial task requiring judgements about the symmetry of pre-bisected lines. Visual stimuli consisted of symmetrically or asymmetrically transected lines, tachystoscopically presented for 150 ms on a computer monitor. Task performance was examined before, immediately after, and 10 min after tSMS/sham stimulation of 20 min over the posterior parietal cortex (PPC: P4 from the international 10-20 system) or superior temporal gyrus (STG: C6). Nine out of 16 subjects misjudged pre-bisected lines by consistently underestimating the length of the right-side segment (judging lines to be exactly pre-bisected when the transector was located to the left of the midpoint, or judging the left-side segment to be longer when the transector was located at the midpoint). In these subjects showing a leftward bias, tSMS over the right STG reduced the magnitude of the leftward bias. This did not occur with tSMS over the right PPC or sham stimulation. In the remaining right-biased subjects, no intervention effect was observed with any stimulation. Our findings indicate that application of tSMS over the right STG modulates visuo-spatial cognition in healthy adults.

Indexed as

non-invasive brain stimulationtranscranial static magnetic field stimulationunilateral spatial neglectvisuospatial cognition

Identifiers

PMID33352946
PMCPMC7766566
OpenAlexW3112275535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.