ArticleCancers2020
Deep Learning Prediction of Cancer Prevalence from Satellite Imagery.
Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Examining noncommunicable diseases using satellite imagery: a systematic literature review.BMC public health · 2024Pooled it
- Spatial analysis of air pollution and cancer prevalence in Texas: a machine learning approach using satellite remote sensing data.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2026Article
- Determining the effects of social-environmental factors on the incidence and mortality of lung cancer in China based on remote sensing and GIS technology during 2007-2016.BMC public health · 2025Article
- ERO1α promotes the proliferation and inhibits apoptosis of colorectal cancer cells by regulating the PI3K/AKT pathway.Journal of molecular histology · 2023Article
- The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Health Equity in Oncology: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Artificial intelligence for clinical oncology.Cancer cell · 2021Review
- Perceptions, Attitudes, and Concerns on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Patients with Cancer.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The worldwide growth of cancer incidence can be explained in part by changes in the prevalence and distribution of risk factors. There are geographical gaps in the estimates of cancer prevalence, which could be filled with innovative methods. We used deep learning (DL) features extracted from satellite images to predict cancer prevalence at the census tract level in seven cities in the United States. We trained the model using detailed cancer prevalence estimates from 2018 available in the CDC (Center for Disease Control) 500 Cities project. Data from 3500 census tracts covering 14,483,366 inhabitants were included. Features were extracted from 170,210 satellite images with deep learning. This method explained up to 64.37% (median = 43.53%) of the variation of cancer prevalence. Satellite features are highly correlated with individual socioeconomic and health measures that are linked to cancer prevalence (age, smoking and drinking status, and obesity). A higher similarity between two environments is associated with better generalization of the model (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.