Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33352789›Full record

ReviewNutrients2020

Psychobiotics: Mechanisms of Action, Evaluation Methods and Effectiveness in Applications with Food Products.

Mariano Del Toro-Barbosa, Alejandra Hurtado-Romero, Luis Eduardo Garcia-Amezquita, Tomás García-Cayuela

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
17.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 161 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The effects ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Heat-TreatedNutrients · 2025
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Gut-brain axis in health and brain disease.Chinese medical journal · 2026
    Review

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mariano Del Toro-BarbosaTecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Avenida General Ramón Corona 2514, 45138 Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico.
Alejandra Hurtado-RomeroTecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Avenida General Ramón Corona 2514, 45138 Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico.
Luis Eduardo Garcia-AmezquitaTecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Avenida General Ramón Corona 2514, 45138 Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-3400-7318
Tomás García-CayuelaTecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Avenida General Ramón Corona 2514, 45138 Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-8038-7468
Tecnológico de Monterrey · MX

Funding

CONACyT Mexico Scholarship funding for M.T.B. and A.H.R.Consejo Estatal de Ciencia y Tecnología de Jalisco (COECYTJAL) and Tecnologico de Monterrey Projects: PRODEPRO 7643-2019, PRODEPRO 7661-2019, FODECIJAL 7799-2019, and FODECIJAL 8245-2019i-Link+2019 program from the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) and Tecnologico de Monterrey Project: LINKB20023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut-brain-microbiota axis consists of a bilateral communication system that enables gut microbes to interact with the brain, and the latter with the gut. Gut bacteria influence behavior, and both depression and anxiety symptoms are directly associated with alterations in the microbiota. Psychobiotics are defined as probiotics that confer mental health benefits to the host when ingested in a particular quantity through interaction with commensal gut bacteria. The action mechanisms by which bacteria exert their psychobiotic potential has not been completely elucidated. However, it has been found that these bacteria provide their benefits mostly through the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, the immune response and inflammation, and through the production of neurohormones and neurotransmitters. This review aims to explore the different approaches to evaluate the psychobiotic potential of several bacterial strains and fermented products. The reviewed literature suggests that the consumption of psychobiotics could be considered as a viable option to both look after and restore mental health, without undesired secondary effects, and presenting a lower risk of allergies and less dependence compared to psychotropic drugs.

Indexed as

BrainGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansHypothalamo-Hypophyseal SystemPituitary-Adrenal SystemProbioticsPsychotropic DrugsPsychotropic Drugsfermented foodgut-brain-microbiota axispsychobiotic

Identifiers

PMID33352789
PMCPMC7767237
OpenAlexW3114664055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.