Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33352701›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Microextraction Techniques with Deep Eutectic Solvents.

Orfeas-Evangelos Plastiras, Eirini Andreasidou, Victoria Samanidou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Extraction and Identification of Active Components fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. An eco-friendly and sensitive deep eutectic solvent-based liquid-phase microextraction procedure for extraction preconcentration of Pb (II) ions.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Orfeas-Evangelos PlastirasLaboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-8422-2991
Eirini AndreasidouLaboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-9013-0081
Victoria SamanidouLaboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-8493-1106

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review, the ever-increasing use of deep eutectic solvents (DES) in microextraction techniques will be discussed, focusing on the reasons needed to replace conventional extraction techniques with greener approaches that follow the principles of green analytical chemistry. The properties of DES will be discussed, pinpointing their exceptional performance and analytical parameters, justifying their current extensive scientific interest. Finally, a variety of applications for commonly used microextraction techniques will be reported.

Indexed as

Green Chemistry TechnologyHumansLiquid Phase MicroextractionSolventsSolventsdeep eutectic solventsdispersive liquid–liquid microextractionliquid–liquid microextractionliquid phase microextractionmicroextractionsingle drop microextractionsolid phase extractionsolid phase microextractionstir bar sorptive extraction

Identifiers

PMID33352701
PMCPMC7767243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.