Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33352690›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Addressing Noise and Skewness in Interpretable Health-Condition Assessment by Learning Model Confidence.

Yuxi Zhou, Shenda Hong, Junyuan Shang, Meng Wu, Qingyun Wang, Hongyan Li, Junqing Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuxi ZhouSchool of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6875-726X
Shenda HongNational Institute of Health Data Science at Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Junyuan ShangSchool of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Meng WuSchool of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Qingyun WangSchool of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Hongyan LiSchool of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Junqing XieCentre for Statistics in Medicine (CSM), Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDROMS), University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing the health condition has a wide range of applications in healthcare, military, aerospace, and industrial fields. Nevertheless, traditional feature-engineered techniques involve manual feature extraction, which are too cumbersome to adapt to the changes caused by the development of sensor network technology. Recently, deep-learning-based methods have achieved initial success in health-condition assessment research, but insufficient considerations for problems such as class skewness, noisy segments, and result interpretability make it difficult to apply them to real-world applications. In this paper, we propose a K-margin-based Interpretable Learning approach for health-condition assessment. In detail, a skewness-aware RCR-Net model is employed to handle problems of class skewness. Furthermore, we present a diagnosis model based on K-margin to automatically handle noisy segments by naturally exploiting expected consistency among the segments associated with each record. Additionally, a knowledge-directed interpretation method is presented to learn domain knowledge-level features automatically without the help of human experts which can be used as an interpretable decision-making basis. Finally, through experimental validation in the field of both medical and aerospace, the proposed method has a better generality and high efficiency with 0.7974 and 0.8005 F1 scores, which outperform all state-of-the-art deep learning methods for health-condition assessment task by 3.30% and 2.99%, respectively.

Indexed as

Machine LearningDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedHumansNoiseclass skewnessdeep learninghealth-condition assessmentmodel interpretabilitynoise

Identifiers

PMID33352690
PMCPMC7765787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.