Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33352118›Full record

ArticleNeuron2021

GluD2- and Cbln1-mediated competitive interactions shape the dendritic arbors of cerebellar Purkinje cells.

Yukari H Takeo, S Andrew Shuster, Linnie Jiang, Miley C Hu, David J Luginbuhl, Thomas Rülicke, Ximena Contreras, Simon Hippenmeyer, Mark J Wagner, Surya Ganguli and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Lurcher Mouse as a Model of Cerebellar Syndromes.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Tools foreNeuro · 2024
    Article
  11. Tools forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Mycoplasma DnaK increases DNA copy number variants in vivo.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Cbln1 Directs Axon Targeting by Corticospinal Neurons Specifically toward Thoraco-Lumbar Spinal Cord.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yukari H TakeoDepartment of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
S Andrew ShusterDepartment of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Neurosciences Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Linnie JiangNeurosciences Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Miley C HuDepartment of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
David J LuginbuhlDepartment of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Thomas RülickeInstitute of Laboratory Animal Science, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ximena ContrerasInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, Am Campus 1, 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria.
Simon HippenmeyerInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, Am Campus 1, 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria.
Mark J WagnerDepartment of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Surya GanguliDepartment of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Liqun LuoDepartment of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: lluo@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USInstitute of Science and Technology Austria · ATUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · AT

Funding

Mosaic Analysis with Double Markers in MiceR01NS050835 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LIQUN LUO · 2005 to 2026
$7.3M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNINDS NIH HHS R01 NS050835
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The synaptotrophic hypothesis posits that synapse formation stabilizes dendritic branches, but this hypothesis has not been causally tested in vivo in the mammalian brain. The presynaptic ligand cerebellin-1 (Cbln1) and postsynaptic receptor GluD2 mediate synaptogenesis between granule cells and Purkinje cells in the molecular layer of the cerebellar cortex. Here we show that sparse but not global knockout of GluD2 causes under-elaboration of Purkinje cell dendrites in the deep molecular layer and overelaboration in the superficial molecular layer. Developmental, overexpression, structure-function, and genetic epistasis analyses indicate that these dendrite morphogenesis defects result from a deficit in Cbln1/GluD2-dependent competitive interactions. A generative model of dendrite growth based on competitive synaptogenesis largely recapitulates GluD2 sparse and global knockout phenotypes. Our results support the synaptotrophic hypothesis at initial stages of dendrite development, suggest a second mode in which cumulative synapse formation inhibits further dendrite growth, and highlight the importance of competition in dendrite morphogenesis.

Indexed as

AnimalsCerebellumDendritesFemaleMiceMice, Inbred ICRMice, KnockoutMice, TransgenicNerve Tissue ProteinsPregnancyProtein BindingProtein PrecursorsPurkinje CellsReceptors, GlutamateCbln1 protein, mouseglutamate receptor delta 2Nerve Tissue ProteinsProtein PrecursorsReceptors, GlutamateCerebellin-1cerebellumcompetitive interactiondendrite growthgenerative modelGluD2parallel fiberPurkinje cellSynaptogenesissynaptotrophic hypothesis

Identifiers

PMID33352118
PMCPMC8833808
OpenAlexW3114325318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.