ArticleTurkish thoracic journal2020
Evaluation of DWI and ADC Sequences' Diagnostic Values in Benign and Malignant Pulmonary Lesions.
Article in Turkish thoracic journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Next-Generation Imaging Techniques for Surgical Guidance in Pediatric Tumors.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Review
- Development and validation of a nomogram combined pre-operative quantitative MR parameters for the prediction of pathological WHO/ISUP grade in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- The value of multisequence MR in the morphological evaluation of peripheral lung cancer.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Development and validation of multi-sequence magnetic resonance imaging radiomics models for predicting tumor response to radiotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Comparative evaluation of non-contrast MRI versus gadoxetic acid-enhanced abbreviated protocols in detecting colorectal liver metastases.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma using diffusion MRI with a multimodal apparent diffusion model.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in Predicting Pathologic Subtypes and Grade in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe gold standard for the diagnosis of lung cancer is conducting a histopathologic study. It is also diagnosed based on some features of a computed tomography (CT) scan. Imposed radiation is a prominent side effect of a CT scan. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) images have currently been used in the diagnosis of different lesions, including those of the brain and breast, and their uses in lung lesions are being evaluated. In this study, to find a safe, sensitive, and specific method, we aimed to assess DWI imaging to replace the CT scan and the positron emission tomography scan. MATERIAL AND
methodsA total of 29 patients were enrolled in the study. In b800 images in DWI, spinal cord and lesion signals were measured, and the lesion-to-cord-signal ratio (LCR) was calculated. The ADC value was measured in a quantitative way. Lesions were also graded qualitatively in b800 DWI sequences.
resultsThere was a significant difference between malignant and benign lesions in terms of DWI grading in b800 images (p<0.001). There was a significant difference between ADC means of a malignant and benign lesion (p=0.003). The mean LCR for malignant lung lesions was significantly higher than that of the benign ones (p<0.001). Considering Grade 3 as the cutoff in DWI grading results in sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 89%, 90%, and 89.6%, respectively. For ADC values, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 79%, 80%, and 79.3%, respectively, were obtained when the cutoff was 1.027×10
conclusionDiffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging is a noninvasive tool, with no contrast agent and requiring ionizing radiations, which could be used for the qualitative, quantitative, and semiquantitative assessment of pulmonary lesions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.