Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33352092›Full record

ArticleTurkish thoracic journal2020

Evaluation of Tobacco Product-Selling Websites Accessed Using Search Engines.

Tülin Çoban, Araz Ceren İncesoy, Baran Demir, Ekinsu Karabiber, Özen Gül, Özgür Çoban, Selin Tosun, Selva Dilan Gölbaşı, Sıla Güvenir, Mahmut Yardım and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish thoracic journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tülin ÇobanDepartment of Public Health, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1665-129X
Araz Ceren İncesoyIntern Doctor at Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4865-1481
Baran DemirIntern Doctor at Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2609-9200
Ekinsu KarabiberIntern Doctor at Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8157-7669
Özen GülIntern Doctor at Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8190-7936
Özgür ÇobanIntern Doctor at Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7612-6310
Selin TosunIntern Doctor at Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9908-3955
Selva Dilan GölbaşıIntern Doctor at Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9567-3544
Sıla GüvenirIntern Doctor at Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0523-9278
Mahmut YardımDepartment of Public Health, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4130-8883
Hilal ÖzcebeDepartment of Public Health, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0918-8519

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough the sale of electronic (e)-cigarettes and "I Quit Ordinary Smoking" (IQOS) is completely prohibited in Turkey, it is observed that tobacco products are sold on the internet. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis descriptive study was conducted between February 11 and 15, 2019, using three search engines (Google, Yandex, and Yaani) in Turkey. All combinations obtained with the keywords (wrapping tobacco, cigarette, hookah, pigtail, cigar, pipe, e-cigarette, snuff, and IQOS) and appendices (sale, price, and shipping) were searched; 2,160 links were scanned. The contents obtained from 130 different URLs were evaluated.

resultsThe most sold product was e-cigarettes (41.2%) and the least sold one was cigarettes (2.5%). Websites contained 500 phone numbers (79%), live support (32.8%), e-mail addresses (67.2%), and postal addresses (42.9%) for communication. Approximately half of the sites had routing tabs to social media. These websites offered some payment facilities (credit card/debit card, 64.7%; money order/electronic funds transfer (EFT), 37.8%; payment at the door, 54.6%) and contained encouraging texts (61.3%) and misinformation (42.9%). More number of websites selling e-cigarettes or IQOS had the campaign sales (89.3% vs 63.6%; p=0.001), possibility of shipping (98.7% vs 86.4%; p<0.05), and false information about the harmlessness of the tobacco products (61.3% vs 11.4%; p<0.001) compared with websites selling other products.

conclusionThis is the first study to show that the tobacco industry is breaking the laws, and the websites which sell tobacco products are easily accessible to the internet users. It is necessary to strengthen the electronic commerce monitoring and control in Turkey.

Identifiers

PMID33352092
PMCPMC7752111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.