ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2020
Population studies of the wild tomato species
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tomato and its relatives are breaking the genomics barriers.Journal of experimental botany · 2025Review
- Unveiling diversity and adaptations of the wild tomato Microbiome in their center of origin in the Ecuadorian Andes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Patterns of presence-absence variation of NLRs across populations of Solanum chilense are clade-dependent and mainly shaped by past demographic history.The New phytologist · 2025Article
- Convergent reduction of immune receptor repertoires during plant adaptation to diverse special lifestyles and habitats.Nature plants · 2025Article
- High-Resolution Disease Phenotyping Reveals Distinct Resistance Mechanisms of Tomato Crop Wild Relatives againstPlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
- Laminarin-triggered defence responses are geographically dependent in natural populations of Solanum chilense.Journal of experimental botany · 2023Article
- Beyond the genomes of Fulvia fulva (syn. Cladosporium fulvum) and Dothistroma septosporum: New insights into how these fungal pathogens interact with their host plants.Molecular plant pathology · 2023Review
- Distinct Phyllosphere Microbiome of Wild Tomato Species in Central Peru upon Dysbiosis.Microbial ecology · 2023Article
- Multi-omics approach highlights differences between RLP classes in Arabidopsis thaliana.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- Quantitative resistance differences between and within natural populations ofEcology and evolution · 2021Article
- Population studies of the wild tomato speciesProceedings. Biological sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Natural plant populations encounter strong pathogen pressure and defence-associated genes are known to be under selection dependent on the pressure by the pathogens. Here, we use populations of the wild tomato
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.