Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33352071›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2020

Do sex hormones at birth predict later-life economic preferences? Evidence from a pregnancy birth cohort study.

Boris van Leeuwen, Paul Smeets, Jeanne Bovet, Gideon Nave, Jonathan Stieglitz, Andrew Whitehouse

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Investigating the effects of single-dose intranasal testosterone on economic preferences in a large randomized trial of men.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Masculinity and Lying.Frontiers in psychology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Boris van LeeuwenDepartment of Economics, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Paul SmeetsDepartment of Finance, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Jeanne BovetDepartment of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Gideon NaveDepartment of Marketing, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jonathan StieglitzInstitute for Advanced Study in Toulouse, University of Toulouse 1 Capitole, Toulouse, France.
Andrew WhitehouseTelethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse · FRMaastricht University · NLNorthumbria University · GBThe Kids Research Institute Australia · AUTilburg University · NLUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Economic preferences may be shaped by exposure to sex hormones around birth. Prior studies of economic preferences and numerous other phenotypic characteristics use digit ratios (2D : 4D), a purported proxy for prenatal testosterone exposure, whose validity has recently been questioned. We use

Indexed as

AustraliaBehaviorCohort StudiesEconomicsEstrogensFemaleFetal BloodFingersGonadal Steroid HormonesHumansMaleParturitionPregnancySex CharacteristicsTestosteroneEstrogensGonadal Steroid HormonesTestosteronedevelopmental originseconomic preferenceshormonestestosterone

Identifiers

PMID33352071
PMCPMC7779492
OpenAlexW3015417626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.