Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33352004›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical nursing2021

Comfort during the bed bath-A randomised crossover trial on the effect of washing without water versus water and soap in nursing students.

Fabian M V Groven, Sandra M G Zwakhalen, Gaby Odekerken-Schröder, Frans Tan, Jan P H Hamers

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical nursing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05310825 (An Examination of the Effect on Various Factors of Bed Baths Applied by Two Different Methods in Intensive Care Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05310825 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

An Examination of the Effect on Various Factors of Bed Baths Applied by Two Different Methods in Intensive Care Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUludag UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled22ConditionsPatient CareArmsDry Wiping Bath with Single-Use Wipes, Traditional Body Wiping Bath
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The effectiveness of nursing interventions on fatigue and sleep quality in hospitalized cancer patients: the role of foot massage and bed bath.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fabian M V GrovenDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4990-0144
Sandra M G ZwakhalenDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7561-5259
Gaby Odekerken-SchröderDepartment of Marketing & Supply Chain Management, School of Business and Economics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Frans TanDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Jan P H HamersDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLMaastricht School of Management · NL

Funding

Arion Holding
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

objectivesTo compare the washing without water method with the water and soap method regarding comfort perceptions of the bed bath.

backgroundBathing affects nurses' and care recipients' comfort. Bedridden care recipients can be bathed in bed with water and soap or with washing without water products. Little is known about the differences between these two bed bath methods regarding comfort perceptions among care recipients and nurses.

designCrossover randomised laboratory-controlled trial, conducted from March 2018-November 2019, according to the CONSORT guidelines.

methodsNursing students were randomly allocated roles as a patient (who received both types of bed baths) or a nurse (who provided both types of bed baths). Also, the order in which the bed baths were received/provided was randomised. A total of 97 students were included in the analysis. Student patients filled out the Patient Evaluation of Emotional Comfort Experienced (PEECE) scale to measure emotional comfort and a single-item question on physical comfort after each bed bath. Student nurses filled out the Physical Demands scale after each bed bath to measure their physical comfort perceptions.

resultsNo differences were found between the two bed bathing methods regarding student patients' emotional or physical comfort levels. Among student nurses, the washing without water method was less physically demanding than the water and soap method.

conclusionsTaking into account time-efficiency and physical comfort for nurses, washing without water seems to be a valuable alternative to water and soap from a care recipient comfort perspective, which should be assessed in a clinical setting in future research. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The washing without water method is less physically demanding for nurses and takes less time. It does not have a detrimental effect on care recipients' emotional and physical comfort. The trial is registered at www.trialregister.nl (ID = NL6787).

Indexed as

SoapsStudents, NursingBathsCross-Over StudiesHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWaterSoapsWaterbed bathcomfortcrossover randomised trialessentials of caremulti-actor perspectivenursing educationphysical demandstime effectivenesswashing without waterwater and soap

Identifiers

PMID33352004
PMCPMC8360161
OpenAlexW3114183123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.