Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33351856›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2020

Age influences on Propofol estimated brain concentration and entropy during maintenance and at return of consciousness during total intravenous anesthesia with target-controlled infusion in unparalyzed patients: An observational prospective trial.

Federico Linassi, Matthias Kreuzer, Eleonora Maran, Antonio Farnia, Paolo Zanatta, Paolo Navalesi, Michele Carron

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comparison of Quantium Consciousness Index and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: An Observational Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Federico LinassiDepartment of Medicine-DIMED, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0751-1164
Matthias KreuzerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Eleonora MaranDepartment of Medicine-DIMED, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Antonio FarniaDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Treviso Regional Hospital, Piazzale Ospedale, Treviso, Italy.
Paolo ZanattaDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Integrated University Hospital of Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani, Verona, Italy.
Paolo NavalesiDepartment of Medicine-DIMED, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Michele CarronDepartment of Medicine-DIMED, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5104-4124
University of Padua · ITCa' Foncello Hospital · ITTUM Klinikum · DEUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAging affects pharmacodynamics/pharmacokinetics of anesthetics, but age effects on Entropy-guided total intravenous anesthesia with target-controlled infusions (TIVA-TCI) are not fully characterized. We compared aging effects on effective estimated brain concentration of Propofol (CeP) during TIVA-TCI Entropy-guided anesthesia, without neuromuscular blockade (NMB).

methodsWe performed an observational, prospective, single-center study enrolling 75 adult women undergoing Entropy-guided Propofol-Remifentanil TIVA-TCI for breast surgery. Primary endpoint was the relationship between age and CeP at maintenance of anesthesia (MA) during Entropy-guided anesthesia. Secondary endpoints were relationships between age and CeP at arousal reaction (AR), return of consciousness (ROC) and explicit recall evenience. We calculated a linear model to evaluate the age's impact on observational variable and performed pairwise tests to compare old (≥65 years, n = 50) and young (<65 years, n = 25) patients or patients with and without an AR.

resultsWe did not observe age-related differences in CeP during MA, but CeP significantly (p = 0,01) decreased with age at ROC. Entropy values during MA increased with age and were significantly higher in the elderly (RE: median 56[IQR49.3-61] vs 47.5[42-52.5],p = 0.001; SE: 51.6[45-55.5] vs 44[IQR40-50],p = 0.005). 18 patients had an AR, having higher maximum RE (92.5[78-96.3] vs 65[56.5-80.5],p<0.001), SE (79[64.8-84] vs 61[52.5-69],p = 0.03, RE-SE (12.5[9.5-16.5] vs 6 [3-9],p<0.001.

conclusionOlder age was associated with lower CeP at ROC, but not during MA in unparalysed patients undergoing breast surgery. Although RE and SE during MA, at comparable CeP, were higher in the elderly, Entropy, and in particular an increasing RE-SE, is a reliable index to detect an AR.

Indexed as

AgingAnesthesia, IntravenousConsciousnessElectroencephalographyAgedAnesthetics, IntravenousBrainEntropyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPropofolProspective StudiesAnesthetics, IntravenousPropofol

Identifiers

PMID33351856
PMCPMC7755218
OpenAlexW3114881781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.