Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33351841›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2020

Regionalization for health improvement: A systematic review.

Maíra Catharina Ramos, Jorge Otávio Maia Barreto, Helena Eri Shimizu, Amanda Pereira Gomes de Moraes, Everton Nunes da Silva

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Good and Bad of Regionalizing Colon Cancer Care.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Toward Iran's health system regionalization: A qualitative approach.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025
    Article
  8. Effect on Travel Distance of a Statewide Regionalization Policy for Initial Breast Cancer Surgery.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maíra Catharina RamosFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brasília, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3829-975X
Jorge Otávio Maia BarretoOswaldo Cruz Foundation, Brasília, Brazil.
Helena Eri ShimizuFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brasília, Brazil.
Amanda Pereira Gomes de MoraesDepartment of Medicine, Federal University of Sergipe, Lagarto, Brazil.
Everton Nunes da SilvaFaculty of Ceilândia, University of Brasilia, Brasília, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regionalization is the integrated organization of a healthcare system, wherein regional structures are responsible for providing and administrating health services in a specific region. This method was adopted by several countries to improve the quality of provided care and to properly utilize available resources. Thus, a systematic review was conducted to verify effective interventions to improve health and management indicators within the health services regionalization. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42016042314). We performed a systematic search in databases during February and March 2017 which was updated in October 2020. There was no language or date restriction. We included experimental and observational studies with interventions focused on regionalization-related actions, measures or policies aimed at decentralizing and organizing health offerings, rationalizing scarce capital and human resources, coordinating health services. A methodological assessment of the studies was performed using instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute and GRADE was also used to assess outcomes. Thirty-nine articles fulfilled the eligibility criteria and sixteen interventions were identified that indicated different degrees of recommendations for improving the management of health system regionalization. The results showed that regionalization was effective under administrative decentralization and for rationalization of resources. The most investigated intervention was the strategy of concentrating procedures in high-volume hospitals, which showed positive outcomes, especially with the reduction of hospitalization days and in-hospital mortality rates. When implementing regionalization, it must be noted that it involves changes in current standards of health practice and in the distribution of health resources, especially for specialized services.

Indexed as

HospitalizationHospital MortalityHospitals, High-VolumeDelivery of Health CareHumans

Identifiers

PMID33351841
PMCPMC7755212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.