Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33351689›Full record

ArticleJournal of human lactation : official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association2022

Educational Resources and Curriculum on Lactation for Health Undergraduate Students: A Scoping Review.

Suzanne Hetzel Campbell, Nicole de Oliveira Bernardes, Thayanthini Tharmaratnam, Flaviana Vely Mendonça Vieira

Open access · bronzeAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human lactation : official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A qualitative inquiry of speech-language therapists' views about breastfeeding management.The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Suzanne Hetzel Campbell70439 University of British Columbia School of Nursing, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8134-0669
Nicole de Oliveira Bernardes70439 University of British Columbia School of Nursing, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5154-3572
Thayanthini Tharmaratnam70439 University of British Columbia School of Nursing, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Flaviana Vely Mendonça Vieira67824 Federal University of Goias, Goiânia, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3085-9428
University of British Columbia · CAUniversidade Federal de Goiás · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreastfeeding is a fundamental component of health care, and health professionals need to be adequately prepared. As part of the system, health care professionals have the ability to influence the establishment and maintenance of breastfeeding. The global literature regarding the curricular approach or established best practices for health professional education in lactation is inconclusive and lacking in rigor. RESEARCH

aimTo explore the literature for the educational resources, methods, and curriculum used in the education of undergraduate health students related to lactation.

methodsA scoping review examining the curricular programs of health professional students in lactation was undertaken exploring and summarizing evidence from peer reviewed and grey literature. A scoping review with a five-stage review process was followed. The database search between 1982-2018 generated 625 results, 79 full-text articles were reviewed, and 29 articles published in English met the inclusion criteria.

resultsIn general, educational resources, methods, curricular approaches, and foundational topics were based on best practice standards. Some authors incorporated a variety of learning methods and provided experiential learning, with evidence of translation of knowledge into clinical practice. In the studies examined, researchers reported that students had improved their: knowledge and attitudes (59%); breastfeeding support skills (45%); and confidence (10%). However, even in programs that focused on developing students' breastfeeding support skills, authors reported a lack of change in students' confidence.

conclusionsAlthough only English articles met the inclusion criteria, this review was unique in its search of multidisciplinary, multilingual, and international studies. Consistency in teaching across disciplines is key and not evident in the studies reviewed.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingCurriculumFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansLactationStudentsbreastfeedingbreastfeeding assessmentbreastfeeding knowledgebreastfeeding practiceslactation education

Identifiers

PMID33351689
PMCPMC8814947
OpenAlexW3115764845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.