Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33351267›Full record

ReviewThe FEBS journal2021

In vivo glial trans-differentiation for neuronal replacement and functional recovery in central nervous system.

Cheng Qian, Bryan Dong, Xu-Yang Wang, Feng-Quan Zhou

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The FEBS journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Base editing ofeLife · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Critical Examination of Müller Glia-DerivedFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cheng QianDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Bryan DongDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Xu-Yang WangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Feng-Quan ZhouDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1525-9969
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Reprogramming retinal ganglion cells for optic nerve regeneration and guidanceR01EY027347 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CAO, XU · 2017 to 2021
$2.0M
Targeting aging genes and pathways to promote optic nerve regenerationR01EY030883 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WAN, MEI · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
Epigenetic regulation of neuronal morphogenesis in development and regenerationR01NS085176 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ZHOU, FENGQUAN · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
Remodeling of chromatin and transcriptomic landscape to enhance optic nerve regenerationR01EY031779 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI QIAN, JIANG · 2020 to 2023
$1.7M
Epigenetics-mediated transcription regulation in mammalsR01GM111514 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI QIAN, JIANG, ZHOU, FENGQUAN · 2014 to 2017
$1.4M
Acquisition of a Carl Zeiss Lightsheet Z.1 Fluorescence MicroscopeS10OD020152 · OD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MCCAFFERY, J. MICHAEL · 2016 to 2016
$597k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027347NEI NIH HHS R01 EY030883NEI NIH HHS R01 EY031779NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM111514NIH HHS S10 OD020152NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS085176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adult mammalian central nervous system (CNS) is deficient in intrinsic machineries to replace neurons lost in injuries or progressive degeneration. Various types of these neurons constitute neural circuitries wired to support vital sensory, motor, and cognitive functions. Based on the pioneer studies in cell lineage conversion, one promising strategy is to convert in vivo glial cells into neural progenitors or directly into neurons that can be eventually rewired for functional recovery. We first briefly summarize the well-studied regeneration-capable CNS in the zebrafish, focusing on their postinjury spontaneous reprogramming of the retinal Müller glia (MG). We then compare the signaling transductions, and transcriptional and epigenetic regulations in the zebrafish MGs with their mammalian counterparts, which perpetuate certain barriers against proliferation and neurogenesis and thus fail in MG-to-progenitor conversion. Next, we discuss emerging evidence from mouse studies, in which the in vivo glia-to-neuron conversion could be achieved with sequential or one-step genetic manipulations, such as the conversions from retinal MGs to interneurons, photoreceptors, or retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), as well as the conversions from midbrain astrocytes to dopaminergic or GABAergic neurons. Some of these in vivo studies showed considerable coverage of subtypes in the newly induced neurons and partial reestablishment in neural circuits and functions. Importantly, we would like to point out some crucial technical concerns that need to be addressed to convincingly show successful glia-to-neuron conversion. Finally, we present challenges and future directions in the field for better neural function recovery.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCentral Nervous SystemHumansNerve RegenerationNeurogliaRecovery of Functionaxon guidanceaxon regenerationcell lineage reprogrammingMüller gliamultiomicsneuronal replacementPTBretinaretinal ganglion cellRGC

Identifiers

PMID33351267
PMCPMC8217397
OpenAlexW3116630073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.