ArticleBlood advances2020
Recombinant porcine FVIII for bleed treatment in acquired hemophilia A: findings from a single-center, 18-patient cohort.
Article in Blood advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sequential Use of Recombinant Porcine Factor VIII and Early Emicizumab in Acquired Hemophilia A: A Case Series.EJHaem · 2026Article
- A Jehovah's Witness with Acquired Hemophilia A Who Successfully Avoided Blood Transfusions by Receiving Emicizumab.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2026Article
- Current state and potential applications of neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) inhibitors in hematologic conditions.American journal of hematology · 2024Review
- Surgery and Prophylaxis with Susoctocog-Alfa in Acquired Hemophilia: Case Series and Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Acquired Hemophilia A: An Update on the Etiopathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Review
- Recombinant porcine factor VIII corrects thrombin generation in vitro in plasma from patients with congenital hemophilia A and inhibitors.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2022Article
- Acquired Haemophilia A: A Review of What We Know.Journal of blood medicine · 2022Review
- Recombinant porcine factor VIII: Lessons from the past and place in the management of hemophilia A with inhibitors in 2021.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2021Review
- New Developments in Diagnosis and Management of Acquired Hemophilia and Acquired von Willebrand Syndrome.HemaSphere · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare bleeding disorder in which acquired autoantibodies to endogenous factor VIII (FVIII) decrease FVIII activity and lead to a bleeding phenotype. A substantial majority of individuals who develop AHA present with severe bleeding. Effective treatment requires both immunosuppressive therapy and prompt hemostatic treatment. Bleeding is commonly treated with bypassing agents (BPAs) such as recombinant activated FVII (rFVIIa) or activated prothrombin complex concentrates Disadvantages to BPAs include the inability to monitor response with standard laboratory assays, inconsistent hemostatic efficacy, and thrombosis. Recombinant porcine FVIII (rpFVIII: Obizur, Baxter, Deerfield, IL) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for bleed treatment in AHA in 2014, and has the advantage of laboratory monitoring of FVIII activity levels and known hemostatic efficacy in the presence of anti-human FVIII inhibitors and after failure of BPAs. Using an algorithm-based approach, rpFVIII has been used to successfully treat 18 patients with AHA at our center with substantially lower doses than the current FDA-recommended dosing. Additionally, data from our cohort show that the preexposure anti-porcine Bethesda titer does not reliably predict the clinical response to rpFVIII treatment and is not correlated with the anti-human Bethesda titer. We also present data showing lower total rpFVIII use for initial bleed resolution when rpVIII is used upfront, as compared with use as rescue therapy. We validated our dosing algorithm, which uses much lower than FDA-recommended doses with 14 more patients than in our previously reported patient series.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.