Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33351064›Full record

ArticleInteractive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2021

Postoperative outcomes of lung transplant recipients with preformed donor-specific antibodies.

Hidenao Kayawake, Toyofumi F Chen-Yoshikawa, Fumiaki Gochi, Satona Tanaka, Kimiko Yurugi, Rie Hishida, Yojiro Yutaka, Yoshito Yamada, Akihiro Ohsumi, Masatsugu Hamaji and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Immune processes in the pathogenesis of chronic lung allograft dysfunction: identifying the missing pieces of the puzzle.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hidenao KayawakeDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate school of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Toyofumi F Chen-YoshikawaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Fumiaki GochiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate school of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Satona TanakaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate school of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Kimiko YurugiDepartment of Transfusion Medicine and Cell Therapy, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Rie HishidaDepartment of Transfusion Medicine and Cell Therapy, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Yojiro YutakaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate school of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Yoshito YamadaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate school of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Akihiro OhsumiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate school of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Masatsugu HamajiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate school of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Daisuke NakajimaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate school of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Hiroshi DateDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate school of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Kyoto University · JPKyoto University Hospital · JPNagoya University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesFew studies have evaluated the outcomes of lung transplantation (LTx) in recipients with preformed donor-specific antibodies (DSAs). This study investigated the postoperative changes in preformed DSAs based on prospectively collected data of DSAs, and the influences of preformed DSAs on postoperative outcomes among LTx recipients.

methodsBetween July 2010 and December 2019, 216 recipients underwent LTx (81 living-donor lobar lung transplants and 135 deceased-donor lung transplants). We reviewed 8 cases with preformed DSAs to determine postoperative changes in DSAs and compared postoperative outcomes between recipients with and without DSAs.

resultsThe preoperative mean fluorescence intensity of preformed DSAs ranged from 1141 to 14 695. Two recipients experienced antibody-mediated rejection within 2 weeks after LTx. DSAs disappeared in 7 recipients; however, 1 recipient experienced the relapse of DSAs and died from chronic lung allograft syndrome (CLAD), whereas 1 recipient had persisting DSAs within the study period and died from CLAD. Neither overall survival (OS) nor CLAD-free survival was significantly different between recipients with and without DSAs (P = 0.26 and P = 0.17, respectively). However, both OS and CLAD-free survival were significantly lower in recipients with DSAs against HLA class II than in those without these antibodies {5-year OS: 25.0% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.9-66.5%] vs 72.1% (95% CI: 63.8-78.9%), P = 0.030 and 5-year CLAD-free survival: 26.7% (95% CI: 1.0-68.6%) vs 73.7% (95% CI: 66.5-79.5%), P = 0.002}.

conclusionsPrognosis in recipients experiencing the relapse of preformed DSAs and those with persisting DSAs may be poor. The recipients with anti-HLA class II preformed DSAs had a significantly worse prognosis.

Indexed as

Transplant RecipientsGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalHLA AntigensHumansIsoantibodiesLungLung TransplantationTissue DonorsHLA AntigensIsoantibodiesAntibody-mediated rejectionChronic lung allograft syndromeLung transplantationPreformed donor-specific antibodies

Identifiers

PMID33351064
PMCPMC8906759
OpenAlexW3117750363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.