ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020
Interrelationships Between Patients' Data Tracking Practices, Data Sharing Practices, and Health Literacy: Onsite Survey Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Patient and Public Willingness to Share Personal Health Data for Third-Party or Secondary Uses: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Barriers and Enablers to Integrating Patient-Generated Health Data in Shared Decision-Making From Health Care Professional and Patient Perspectives: Scoping Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- Comparing Usual Care With Coordinated Clinician and Patient Use of Mobile Technology in Primary Care for Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: Practice-Based Pilot Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Sharing Patient-Generated Health Data: The Role of Healthcare Quality, Mistrust, and Discrimination Across Race-Gender Identities.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Patient and Clinician Attitudes Toward Mobile Health Apps: Qualitative Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- Comfort With Sharing Food Insecurity Risk for Clinical Care Among Individuals With and Without a Cancer History: Findings From a National Survey.AJPM focus · 2025Article
- Health apps: a cross-sectional study exploring patient motivations and usage implications.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Perceived, objective, and applied numeracy among pregnant women engaged in home blood pressure monitoring in Ghana.AJOG global reports · 2025Article
- The Impact of Data Control and Delayed Discounting on the Public's Willingness to Share Different Types of Health Care Data: Empirical Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Health data sharing attitudes towards primary and secondary use of data: a systematic review.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Contributing to Accessibility Datasets: Reflections on Sharing Study Data by Blind People.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2023Article
- Returning study results to research participants: Data access, format, and sharing preferences.International journal of medical informatics · 2023Article
- Willingness to Share Data From Wearable Health and Activity Trackers: Analysis of the 2019 Health Information National Trends Survey Data.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2021Article
- Public Attitudes to Digital Health Research Repositories: Cross-sectional International Survey.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough the use of patient-generated data (PGD) in the optimization of patient care shows great promise, little is known about whether patients who track their PGD necessarily share the data with their clinicians. Meanwhile, health literacy-an important construct that captures an individual's ability to manage their health and to engage with their health care providers-has often been neglected in prior studies focused on PGD tracking and sharing. To leverage the full potential of PGD, it is necessary to bridge the gap between patients' data tracking and data sharing practices by first understanding the interrelationships between these practices and the factors contributing to these practices.
objectiveThis study aims to systematically examine the interrelationships between PGD tracking practices, data sharing practices, and health literacy among individual patients.
methodsWe surveyed 109 patients at the time they met with a clinician at a university health center, unlike prior research that often examined patients' retrospective experience after some time had passed since their clinic visit. The survey consisted of 39 questions asking patients about their PGD tracking and sharing practices based on their current clinical encounter. The survey also contained questions related to the participants' health literacy. All the participants completed the survey on a tablet device. The onsite survey study enabled us to collect ecologically valid data based on patients' immediate experiences situated within their clinic visit.
resultsWe found no evidence that tracking PGD was related to self-reports of having sufficient information to manage one's health; however, the number of data types participants tracked positively related to their self-assessed ability to actively engage with health care providers. Participants' data tracking practices and their health literacy did not relate to their data sharing practices; however, their ability to engage with health care providers positively related to their willingness to share their data with clinicians in the future. Participants reported several benefits of, and barriers to, sharing their PGD with clinicians.
conclusionsAlthough tracking PGD could help patients better engage with health care providers, it may not provide patients with sufficient information to manage their health. The gaps between tracking and sharing PGD with health care providers call for efforts to inform patients of how their data relate to their health and to facilitate efficient clinician-patient communication. To realize the full potential of PGD and to promote individuals' health literacy, empowering patients to effectively track and share their PGD is important-both technologies and health care providers can play important roles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.