Evidence map›Paper›PMID 3335079›Full record

ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis

Pulmonary tumor colony formation following i.v. inoculation of six human colorectal carcinoma xenografts in young gnotobiotic athymic mice.

R J Zimmerman, E T Gaillard, A Goldin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R J ZimmermanDepartment of Pharmacology, Cetus Corporation, Emeryville, California 94608.
E T Gaillard
A Goldin
Georgetown University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lung colonizing potential of 6 xenografted human colorectal adenocarcinomas following tail vein inoculation of tumor cell suspensions into gnotobiotic 3-4-week-old congenitally athymic mice was investigated. One of the lines, CRCo2, was of particular interest, as apparently distinctive lung colonizing phenotypes, large (greater than 2.5 mm diameter) and small (less than 1 mm diameter) colonies were identified, and variant lines with greater, equal, or lesser ability to grow in the lungs relative to the sc tumor of origin were observed. Another line, CRCo1, was also able to grow well in the lungs following tail vein inoculation, but subsequent cycles of lung tumor recovery and reinoculation i.v. did not result in an enhancement of the tumor's lung colonizing ability relative to the initial i.v. inoculation of the sc carried tumor. Scattered lung colonies were observed following i.v. inoculation of sc carried xenografts in three of the four other lines, but we could not consistently recover lung colonies with these tumors. The data are in accord with the clinical observation that pulmonary metastasis is not a high frequency event in human colorectal carcinoma, illustrating the selective nature and experimental utility of this model of metastasis. Further, there were indications of the inefficient and/or random nature of the metastatic process in some of the tumors, while in others, evidence for both effectively higher and lower metastatic variants were found, as might be predicted in heterogeneous tumor cell populations.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAnimalsCell LineColonic NeoplasmsGerm-Free LifeHumansInjections, IntravenousLung NeoplasmsMiceMice, NudeNeoplasm TransplantationRectal NeoplasmsTransplantation, Heterologous

Identifiers

PMID3335079
OpenAlexW2026174230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.