ArticleMedicine2020
Efficacy and safety of Qishen granules for chronic heart failure: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research Progress on the Role of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Regulating Ferroptosis in Cardiovascular Diseases.Biology · 2026Review
- Effects of the Wenyang Zhenshuai Granule on the Expression of LncRNA-MiR143HG/miR-143 Regulating ERK5 in H9C2 Cardiomyocytes.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundQishen granules (QSG) is a famous traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) formula used to treat chronic heart failure (CHF). The objective of this protocol is to clarify the efficacy and safety of QSG for treating CHF.
methodsSix databases will be electronically searched up to November 1, 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in English and Chinese languages. Two independent reviewers will complete tasks of literature retrieval and data extraction. After that, the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool will be utilized to assess methodological quality. The primary outcomes are left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular fractional shortening, and N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide. The secondary outcomes consist of composite cardiac events, adverse effects, and quality of life. Meta-analysis will be performed using the Revman version 5.3.
resultsThis study will provide a high-quality synthesis of current evidence of QSG for CHF from primary and secondary outcomes.
conclusionThis study will provide evidence for the effectiveness and safety of QSG in the treatment of CHF. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020150442.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.