ArticleMedicine2020
Prognostic role of urokinase plasminogen activator in hepatocellular carcinoma: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrative analysis of multi-omics data identified PLG as key gene related to Anoikis resistance and immune phenotypes in hepatocellular carcinoma.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- circPSD3 is a promising inhibitor of uPA system to inhibit vascular invasion and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma.Molecular cancer · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies have showed that the high expression of urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) in pathology and serology is closely related to the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there are no systematic reviews for these evidence, and the association between uPA and HCC is still not completely understood. Therefore, we will undertake a systematic review of the literature to summarize previous evidence regarding this topic, in order to clarify the prognostic significance of uPA in HCC. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Studies comparing the HCC patients with high and low expression of uPA on the clinicopathological features and the prognosis are eligible for this review. Outcomes include all endpoints about survival and clinicopathological features. Prospective or retrospective primary studies which published in English will be included. Four databases of Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library will be systematically searched from their inception to Mar 2021 to retrieve relevant studies. Reference lists of included studies will be manually reviewed and grey literatures will be identified by Google Scholar. Two reviewers will independently screen the records and extract the information and data of the included studies. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale will be used to assess the quality of included studies. Hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval will be pooled to assess the association between uPA expression and the prognosis. Pooled odds ratio and 95% confidence interval will be used for other outcomes. Heterogeneity will be assessed using the Cochrane Q test and I2 statistic, and a subgroup analysis will be performed if necessary. Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation method will be applied to assess the certainty of evidence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol required information extracted from previously published articles. So, there is no ethical problem in this study. We plan to publish our findings in peer-reviewed journals and relevant conference proceedings. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: This study has been registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews database (no.CRD42020150340).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.