Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33349996›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2021

Time-efficient measurement of subtle blood-brain barrier leakage using a T

Marieke van den Kerkhof, Paulien H M Voorter, Lisanne P W Canjels, Joost J A de Jong, Robert J van Oostenbrugge, Abraham A Kroon, Jacobus F A Jansen, Walter H Backes

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. 7T dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the detection of subtle blood-brain barrier leakage.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marieke van den KerkhofDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6849-4751
Paulien H M VoorterDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2724-4502
Lisanne P W CanjelsDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4880-2670
Joost J A de JongDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4469-0763
Robert J van OostenbruggeSchool for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1032-9099
Abraham A KroonCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7750-8249
Jacobus F A JansenDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5271-8060
Walter H BackesDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7905-0681
Maastricht University · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBlood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption is commonly measured with DCE-MRI using continuous dynamic scanning. For precise measurement of subtle BBB leakage, a long acquisition time (>20 minutes) is required. As extravasation of the contrast agent is slow, discrete sampling at strategic time points might be beneficial, and gains scan time for additional sequences. Here, we aimed to explore the feasibility of a sparsely sampled MRI protocol at 7 T.

methodsThe scan protocol consisted of a precontrast quantitative T

resultsThe simulations showed that two postcontrast T

conclusionThe sparsely sampled protocol was demonstrated to be sensitive to quantify subtle BBB leakage, despite using only three T

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierWhite MatterContrast MediaGray MatterMagnetic Resonance ImagingContrast Media7TBBB leakageDCE-MRIT1 mapping

Identifiers

PMID33349996
PMCPMC7898690
OpenAlexW3112991363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.