Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33349845›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2021

Development and validation of a prognostic model based on comorbidities to predict COVID-19 severity: a population-based study.

Francisco Gude-Sampedro, Carmen Fernández-Merino, Lucía Ferreiro, Óscar Lado-Baleato, Jenifer Espasandín-Domínguez, Xurxo Hervada, Carmen M Cadarso, Luis Valdés

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Inhaled ciclesonide for outpatient treatment of COVID-19 in adults at risk of adverse outcomes: a randomised controlled trial (COVERAGE).Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Trial
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Francisco Gude-SampedroDepartamento de Epidemiología. Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela. Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Carmen Fernández-MerinoGrupo de Métodos de Investigación, Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Santiago (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Lucía FerreiroServicio de Neumología. Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela. Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Óscar Lado-BaleatoDepartamento de Estadística, Análisis Matemático y Optimización. Grupo Interdisciplinar de Bioestadística y Ciencia de Datos Biométricos (GRID-BDS), Universidad de Santiago de Compostela. Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Jenifer Espasandín-DomínguezDepartamento de Epidemiología. Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela. Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Xurxo HervadaSubdirección de Información sobre Saúde e Epidemioloxía. Dirección Xeral de Saúde Pública, Consellería de Sanidade, Xunta de Galicia. Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Carmen M CadarsoDepartamento de Estadística, Análisis Matemático y Optimización. Grupo Interdisciplinar de Bioestadística y Ciencia de Datos Biométricos (GRID-BDS), Universidad de Santiago de Compostela. Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Luis ValdésServicio de Neumología. Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela. Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prognosis of patients with COVID-19 infection is uncertain. We derived and validated a new risk model for predicting progression to disease severity, hospitalization, admission to intensive care unit (ICU) and mortality in patients with COVID-19 infection (Gal-COVID-19 scores).

methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of patients with COVID-19 infection confirmed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in Galicia, Spain. Data were extracted from electronic health records of patients, including age, sex and comorbidities according to International Classification of Primary Care codes (ICPC-2). Logistic regression models were used to estimate the probability of disease severity. Calibration and discrimination were evaluated to assess model performance.

resultsThe incidence of infection was 0.39% (10 454 patients). A total of 2492 patients (23.8%) required hospitalization, 284 (2.7%) were admitted to the ICU and 544 (5.2%) died. The variables included in the models to predict severity included age, gender and chronic comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, obesity, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, liver disease, chronic kidney disease and haematological cancer. The models demonstrated a fair-good fit for predicting hospitalization {AUC [area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve] 0.77 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76, 0.78]}, admission to ICU [AUC 0.83 (95%CI 0.81, 0.85)] and death [AUC 0.89 (95%CI 0.88, 0.90)].

conclusionsThe Gal-COVID-19 scores provide risk estimates for predicting severity in COVID-19 patients. The ability to predict disease severity may help clinicians prioritize high-risk patients and facilitate the decision making of health authorities.

Indexed as

SARS-CoV-2AdultAgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveComorbidityCOVID-19Critical CareFemaleHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPatient AdmissionPredictive Value of Testsadmission to ICUCOVID-19deathhospitalizationprediction modelseverity

Identifiers

PMID33349845
PMCPMC7799114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.